Materials / Compare

Glass vs. Steel AISI 1018

Compare Glass vs. Steel AISI 1018 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
GlassNatural
Steel AISI 1018Wrought
Try it on a partA sample part to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strengthnot given (tensile used)372MPasourceproducer-stated, cold drawn
Ultimate tensile strength41MPasourcetypical mean surface tensile stress at fracture (MOR), 60 s load, weathered, 50% breakage probability441MPasourceproducer-stated, cold drawn
Flexural strength41MPasourcemean MOR (same value as tensile)not sourced
Elongation at breaknot sourced15%sourcein 2 in (50.8 mm)
Young's modulus (stiffness)72GPasourcetypical200GPasourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Density2,500kg/m³sourcetypical7,861kg/m³sourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Strength to weight16.4kN·m/kg47.3kN·m/kg2.89x higher
Stiffness to weight28.8MN·m/kg13% higher25.4MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.22sourcetypical0.32sourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Shear modulus29.5GPa75.7GPa2.57x stiffer in shear
Bulk modulus42.9GPa185GPa
Speed of sound5,367m/s5,043m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.937W/m·Ksourcetypical at 75 F51.9W/m·Ksourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Thermal expansion8.3µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 75-575 F12µm/m·Ksourcebase material: unalloyed carbon steel, Ovako family table (S275JR, 'none alloyed structural steels', C <= 0.21%); mean 20-300 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing41.5µm growth45% less60µm growth
Specific heat880J/kg·Ksourcetypical at 75 F486J/kg·Ksourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)0.426mm²/s13.6mm²/s31.9x faster
Thermal shock resistance50.1W/m5,473W/m109x more resistant
Max service temperature511°Csourcestrain point (ASTM C336) - stress-relaxation onset, not a rated service limitnot sourced
Values forAnnealed soda-lime-silica float glass, Pilkington North America Technical Bulletin ATS-129 (04/2025)AISI 1018 cold drawn bar (Niagara LaSalle, cold-finished bar producer)

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Glass stronger than Steel AISI 1018?

Steel AISI 1018 is stronger: its yield strength is 372 MPa against tensile strength 41 MPa for Glass (9.07x).

Which is lighter, Glass or Steel AISI 1018?

Glass is lighter: 2,500 kg/m³ against 7,861 kg/m³ for Steel AISI 1018.

Which is stiffer, Glass or Steel AISI 1018?

Steel AISI 1018 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 72 GPa for Glass, so the same part in Steel AISI 1018 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Glass or Steel AISI 1018?

For the same stiffness or strength: Glass is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong panel or plate; Steel AISI 1018 is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam.

Part that must beGlassSteel AISI 1018
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter13% heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter1.89x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter2.24x heavier
Strong rod or tie2.89x heavierlighter
Strong beam38% heavierlighter
Strong panel or platelighter4% heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Glass or Steel AISI 1018?

Steel AISI 1018 conducts heat better: 51.9 W/m·K against 0.937 W/m·K for Glass.

Which expands less with temperature?

Glass expands less: 8.3 µm/m·K against 12 µm/m·K for Steel AISI 1018.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumStainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110Steel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelGlassSteel AISI 1018
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumStainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110Steel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickGlassSteel AISI 1018
Strength against density

Related comparisons