Materials / Compare

FDM HIPS vs. SLS PA12 Nylon

Compare FDM HIPS vs. SLS PA12 Nylon strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
FDM HIPS3D printed (FDM)
SLS PA12 Nylon3D printed (SLS)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strengthnot given (tensile used)not given (tensile used)
Ultimate tensile strength18.4MPasourcetypical48MPasourcetypical2.61x stronger
Flexural strength31.8MPasourcetypicalnot sourced
Elongation at break1.4%sourcetypical18%sourcetypical12.9x more ductile
Young's modulus (stiffness)1.59GPasourcetypical1.65GPasourcetypical
Density1,023kg/m³sourcetypical930kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight18kN·m/kg51.6kN·m/kg2.87x higher
Stiffness to weight1.55MN·m/kg1.77MN·m/kg14% higher
Poisson's rationot sourcednot sourced
Shear modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Bulk modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Speed of sound1,246m/s1,332m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.17W/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution PS 486N injection-molding HIPS, typicalnot sourced
Thermal expansion80µm/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution PS 486N injection-molding HIPS, typicalnot sourced
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing400µm growthnot sourced
Specific heatnot sourcednot sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)not sourcednot sourced
Thermal shock resistancenot sourcednot sourced
Melting pointnot sourced176°Csourcetypical
Glass transition99°Csourcetypicalnot sourced
Max service temperature86°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa64°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa, X orientation
Values forBASF Forward AM (BASF 3D Printing Solutions) Ultrafuse HiPS, TDS v2.2 (13.11.2019), printed specimens, XY 'Flat'. Specimen print settings are not stated; recommended processing on the sheet: nozzle 240-260 °C, bed 100-120 °C, 40-80 mm/s. Product is discontinued (Forward AM product page) but the TDS is still served by Forward AM.EOS PA 2200 (PA12) Material Data Sheet, process parameter 'Balance' at 120 µm layer thickness, X orientation, dry (conditioned values not given). Live MDS status 04.10.2026, last changed 10.09.2026; PDF via ?topdf=... link on the same page.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

FDM HIPS and SLS PA12 Nylon are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is FDM HIPS stronger than SLS PA12 Nylon?

SLS PA12 Nylon is stronger: its tensile strength is 48 MPa against 18.4 MPa for FDM HIPS (2.61x).

Which is lighter, FDM HIPS or SLS PA12 Nylon?

SLS PA12 Nylon is lighter: 930 kg/m³ against 1,023 kg/m³ for FDM HIPS.

Which is stiffer, FDM HIPS or SLS PA12 Nylon?

SLS PA12 Nylon is stiffer: Young's modulus 1.65 GPa against 1.59 GPa for FDM HIPS, so the same part in SLS PA12 Nylon deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, FDM HIPS or SLS PA12 Nylon?

For the same stiffness or strength: SLS PA12 Nylon is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beFDM HIPSSLS PA12 Nylon
Stiff rod or tie (tension)14% heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)12% heavierlighter
Stiff panel or plate11% heavierlighter
Strong rod or tie2.87x heavierlighter
Strong beam2.08x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate1.78x heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which is more ductile, FDM HIPS or SLS PA12 Nylon?

SLS PA12 Nylon stretches further before it breaks: 18% elongation at break against 1.4% for FDM HIPS.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFSLA Resin Tough 2000DMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelFDM HIPSSLS PA12 Nylon
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ADMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickFDM HIPSSLS PA12 Nylon
Strength against density

Related comparisons