Materials / Compare

FDM HIPS vs. FDM PAHT-CF

Compare FDM HIPS vs. FDM PAHT-CF strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
FDM HIPS3D printed (FDM)
FDM PAHT-CF3D printed (FDM)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strengthnot given (tensile used)not given (tensile used)
Ultimate tensile strength18.4MPasourcetypical92MPasourcetypical5x stronger
Flexural strength31.8MPasourcetypical125MPasourcetypical3.93x stronger in bending
Elongation at break1.4%sourcetypical8.4%sourcetypical6x more ductile
Young's modulus (stiffness)1.59GPasourcetypical3.86GPasourcetypical2.43x stiffer
Density1,023kg/m³sourcetypical1,060kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight18kN·m/kg86.8kN·m/kg4.83x higher
Stiffness to weight1.55MN·m/kg3.64MN·m/kg2.35x higher
Poisson's rationot sourcednot sourced
Shear modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Bulk modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Speed of sound1,246m/s1,908m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.17W/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution PS 486N injection-molding HIPS, typicalnot sourced
Thermal expansion80µm/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution PS 486N injection-molding HIPS, typicalnot sourced
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing400µm growthnot sourced
Specific heatnot sourcednot sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)not sourcednot sourced
Thermal shock resistancenot sourcednot sourced
Melting pointnot sourced225°Csourcetypical
Glass transition99°Csourcetypical70°Csourcetypical
Max service temperature86°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa170°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa1.98x hotter
Values forBASF Forward AM (BASF 3D Printing Solutions) Ultrafuse HiPS, TDS v2.2 (13.11.2019), printed specimens, XY 'Flat'. Specimen print settings are not stated; recommended processing on the sheet: nozzle 240-260 °C, bed 100-120 °C, 40-80 mm/s. Product is discontinued (Forward AM product page) but the TDS is still served by Forward AM.Bambu Lab PAHT-CF, TDS V3.0, printed specimens X-Y, dry state; nozzle 290 °C, bed 100 °C, 100 mm/s, 100% infill; annealed and dried 80 °C for 12 h before testing.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

FDM HIPS and FDM PAHT-CF are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is FDM HIPS stronger than FDM PAHT-CF?

FDM PAHT-CF is stronger: its tensile strength is 92 MPa against 18.4 MPa for FDM HIPS (5x).

Which is lighter, FDM HIPS or FDM PAHT-CF?

FDM HIPS is lighter: 1,023 kg/m³ against 1,060 kg/m³ for FDM PAHT-CF.

Which is stiffer, FDM HIPS or FDM PAHT-CF?

FDM PAHT-CF is stiffer: Young's modulus 3.86 GPa against 1.59 GPa for FDM HIPS, so the same part in FDM PAHT-CF deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, FDM HIPS or FDM PAHT-CF?

For the same stiffness or strength: FDM PAHT-CF is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beFDM HIPSFDM PAHT-CF
Stiff rod or tie (tension)2.35x heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)1.5x heavierlighter
Stiff panel or plate30% heavierlighter
Strong rod or tie4.83x heavierlighter
Strong beam2.82x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate2.16x heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which is more ductile, FDM HIPS or FDM PAHT-CF?

FDM PAHT-CF stretches further before it breaks: 8.4% elongation at break against 1.4% for FDM HIPS.

Which handles higher temperatures, FDM HIPS or FDM PAHT-CF?

FDM PAHT-CF does: 170 °C against 86 °C for FDM HIPS, both HDT 1.8 MPa.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelFDM HIPSFDM PAHT-CF
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickFDM HIPSFDM PAHT-CF
Strength against density

Related comparisons