Materials / Compare
Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Magnesium AZ31B-H24
Compare Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Magnesium AZ31B-H24 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 1,207MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. hot-rolled bar, 0.2% offset | 220MPasourcetypical, H24, 0.5-6 mm, 0.2 % proof stress |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 1,389MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar | 290MPasourcetypical, H24, 0.5-6 mm |
| Elongation at break | 20%sourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar | 13%sourcetypical, H24, 0.5-6 mm, gauge 5.65√A |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 200GPasourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged | 44.8GPasourcetypical (handbook physical constant) |
| Density | 8,221kg/m³sourcenominal, annealed and aged | 1,769kg/m³sourcenominal |
| Strength to weight | 147kN·m/kg18% higher | 124kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 24.3MN·m/kg | 25.3MN·m/kg4% higher |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.294sourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged | 0.35sourcetypical (handbook physical constant) |
| Shear modulus | 77.3GPa4.66x stiffer in shear | 16.6GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 162GPa | 49.8GPa |
| Speed of sound | 4,932m/s | 5,032m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 11.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged (calculated from resistivity per footnote a) | 76.9W/m·Ksourcetypical (temper/temperature not stated) |
| Thermal expansion | 13.2µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 21-93 °C, annealed + aged | 26.8µm/m·Ksourcetypical (temperature range not stated) |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 66µm growth2.03x less | 134µm growth |
| Specific heat | 435J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C | 1,040J/kg·Ksourcetypical |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 3.19mm²/s | 41.8mm²/s13.1x faster |
| Thermal shock resistance | 3,680W/m | 9,159W/m2.49x more resistant |
| Melting point | 1,260–1,336°Csourcemelting range | not sourced |
| Max service temperature | 704°Csourceupper use temperature stated by producer | 149°Csourcestated application limit |
| Values for | INCONEL alloy 718, standard grade, 1750 °F/1 hr anneal + 1325 °F/8 hr F.C. to 1150 °F aged; Special Metals bulletin SMC-045 typical values | AZ31B-H24 sheet 0.016-0.062 in., MIL-HDBK-5J Table 4.2.1.0(b) (AMS 4377); strengths are S-basis MINIMUMS |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is Nickel Inconel 718 stronger than Magnesium AZ31B-H24?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stronger: its yield strength is 1,207 MPa against 220 MPa for Magnesium AZ31B-H24 (5.49x).
Which is lighter, Nickel Inconel 718 or Magnesium AZ31B-H24?
Magnesium AZ31B-H24 is lighter: 1,769 kg/m³ against 8,221 kg/m³ for Nickel Inconel 718.
Which is stiffer, Nickel Inconel 718 or Magnesium AZ31B-H24?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 44.8 GPa for Magnesium AZ31B-H24, so the same part in Nickel Inconel 718 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Nickel Inconel 718 or Magnesium AZ31B-H24?
For the same stiffness or strength: Nickel Inconel 718 is lighter for a strong rod or tie; Magnesium AZ31B-H24 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | Nickel Inconel 718 | Magnesium AZ31B-H24 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 4% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 2.2x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 2.82x heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 18% heavier |
| Strong beam | 49% heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 1.98x heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Nickel Inconel 718 or Magnesium AZ31B-H24?
Magnesium AZ31B-H24 conducts heat better: 76.9 W/m·K against 11.4 W/m·K for Nickel Inconel 718.
Which expands less with temperature?
Nickel Inconel 718 expands less: 13.2 µm/m·K against 26.8 µm/m·K for Magnesium AZ31B-H24.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Stainless 17-4PH
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 4340
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 1045
- Magnesium AZ31B-H24 vs. Concrete
- Magnesium AZ31B-H24 vs. Aluminum 5052-H32
- Magnesium AZ31B-H24 vs. Aluminum
- Magnesium AZ31B-H24 vs. Aluminum 6061-T6