Materials / Compare
Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Titanium Ti-6Al-4V
Compare Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Titanium Ti-6Al-4V strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 1,207MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. hot-rolled bar, 0.2% offset | 885MPasourcetypical, plate (>0.187 in), annealed, 0.2% offset |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 1,389MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar | 940MPasourcetypical, plate, annealed |
| Elongation at break | 20%sourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar | 16%sourcetypical, in 2 in., plate annealed |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 200GPasourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged | 107–122GPasourcetypical range, 20 °C |
| Density | 8,221kg/m³sourcenominal, annealed and aged | 4,430kg/m³sourcenominal |
| Strength to weight | 147kN·m/kg | 200kN·m/kg36% higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 24.3MN·m/kg | 25.8MN·m/kg6% higher |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.294sourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged | 0.342sourcemean of TIMET measurements |
| Shear modulus | 77.3GPa1.81x stiffer in shear | 42.7GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 162GPa | 121GPa |
| Speed of sound | 4,932m/s | 5,084m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 11.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged (calculated from resistivity per footnote a) | 6.6W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C, mill annealed |
| Thermal expansion | 13.2µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 21-93 °C, annealed + aged | 9µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 0-100 °C |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 66µm growth | 45µm growth47% less |
| Specific heat | 435J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C | 580J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 3.19mm²/s24% faster | 2.57mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 3,680W/m | 3,730W/m1% more resistant |
| Melting point | 1,260–1,336°Csourcemelting range | 1,630–1,650°Csourcemelting range |
| Max service temperature | 704°Csourceupper use temperature stated by producer | 400°Csourceupper recommended use temperature |
| Values for | INCONEL alloy 718, standard grade, 1750 °F/1 hr anneal + 1325 °F/8 hr F.C. to 1150 °F aged; Special Metals bulletin SMC-045 typical values | TIMETAL 6-4 (Ti-6Al-4V Grade 5) annealed plate typical (TIMET properties manual) + TIMET datasheet TMC-0150 physical properties |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is Nickel Inconel 718 stronger than Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stronger: its yield strength is 1,207 MPa against 885 MPa for Titanium Ti-6Al-4V (36%).
Which is lighter, Nickel Inconel 718 or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
Titanium Ti-6Al-4V is lighter: 4,430 kg/m³ against 8,221 kg/m³ for Nickel Inconel 718.
Which is stiffer, Nickel Inconel 718 or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 115 GPa for Titanium Ti-6Al-4V, so the same part in Nickel Inconel 718 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Nickel Inconel 718 or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
For the same stiffness or strength: Titanium Ti-6Al-4V is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | Nickel Inconel 718 | Titanium Ti-6Al-4V |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 6% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 40% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 1.54x heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | 36% heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 1.51x heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 1.59x heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Nickel Inconel 718 or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
Nickel Inconel 718 conducts heat better: 11.4 W/m·K against 6.6 W/m·K for Titanium Ti-6Al-4V.
Which expands less with temperature?
Titanium Ti-6Al-4V expands less: 9 µm/m·K against 13.2 µm/m·K for Nickel Inconel 718.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Stainless 17-4PH
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 4340
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 1045
- Titanium Ti-6Al-4V vs. Titanium
- Titanium Ti-6Al-4V vs. DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium
- Titanium Ti-6Al-4V vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Titanium Ti-6Al-4V vs. Steel AISI 4340