Materials / Compare

Magnesium AZ31B-H24 vs. Silicon

Compare Magnesium AZ31B-H24 vs. Silicon strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Magnesium AZ31B-H24Wrought
SiliconGrown single crystal
Try it on a partA sample part to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength220MPasourcetypical, H24, 0.5-6 mm, 0.2 % proof stressnot given (tensile used)
Ultimate tensile strength290MPasourcetypical, H24, 0.5-6 mm130MPasourcemodulus of rupture (bending fracture stress); brittle, no yield point
Flexural strengthnot sourced130MPasourcemodulus of rupture
Elongation at break13%sourcetypical, H24, 0.5-6 mm, gauge 5.65√Anot sourced
Young's modulus (stiffness)44.8GPasourcetypical (handbook physical constant)131GPasourcetypical (single quoted value of an anisotropic crystal)
Density1,769kg/m³sourcenominal2,329kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight124kN·m/kg2.23x higher55.8kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight25.3MN·m/kg56.2MN·m/kg2.22x higher
Poisson's ratio0.35sourcetypical (handbook physical constant)0.221sourcetypical
Shear modulus16.6GPa53.6GPa3.23x stiffer in shear
Bulk modulus49.8GPa78.3GPa
Speed of sound5,032m/s7,500m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity76.9W/m·Ksourcetypical (temper/temperature not stated)163W/m·Ksourcetypical at 313 K (40 °C)
Thermal expansion26.8µm/m·Ksourcetypical (temperature range not stated)2.62µm/m·Ksourcetypical at 300 K
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing134µm growth13.1µm growth10.2x less
Specific heat1,040J/kg·Ksourcetypical732J/kg·Ksourcetypical
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)41.8mm²/s95.6mm²/s2.29x faster
Thermal shock resistance9,159W/m48,095W/m5.25x more resistant
Melting pointnot sourced1,412°Csourcetypical
Max service temperature149°Csourcestated application limit300°Csourceproducer's maximum application temperature (optical components)
Values forAZ31B-H24 sheet 0.016-0.062 in., MIL-HDBK-5J Table 4.2.1.0(b) (AMS 4377); strengths are S-basis MINIMUMSSynthetic single-crystal silicon (cubic, diamond structure), Korth Kristalle (crystal grower) material data; Korth usually supplies Floating Zone (FZ) material, Czochralski (Cz) also offered. Silicon is elastically anisotropic; the producer quotes one modulus and the solver is isotropic.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Magnesium AZ31B-H24 stronger than Silicon?

Magnesium AZ31B-H24 is stronger: its yield strength is 220 MPa against tensile strength 130 MPa for Silicon (1.69x).

Which is lighter, Magnesium AZ31B-H24 or Silicon?

Magnesium AZ31B-H24 is lighter: 1,769 kg/m³ against 2,329 kg/m³ for Silicon.

Which is stiffer, Magnesium AZ31B-H24 or Silicon?

Silicon is stiffer: Young's modulus 131 GPa against 44.8 GPa for Magnesium AZ31B-H24, so the same part in Silicon deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Magnesium AZ31B-H24 or Silicon?

For the same stiffness or strength: Magnesium AZ31B-H24 is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Silicon is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate.

Part that must beMagnesium AZ31B-H24Silicon
Stiff rod or tie (tension)2.22x heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)30% heavierlighter
Stiff panel or plate9% heavierlighter
Strong rod or tielighter2.23x heavier
Strong beamlighter1.87x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter1.71x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Magnesium AZ31B-H24 or Silicon?

Silicon conducts heat better: 163 W/m·K against 76.9 W/m·K for Magnesium AZ31B-H24.

Which expands less with temperature?

Silicon expands less: 2.62 µm/m·K against 26.8 µm/m·K for Magnesium AZ31B-H24.

Among 72 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPCB Laminate FR-4Ceramic Alumina 96%Ceramic Aluminum NitrideAluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Magnesium AZ31B-H24Silicon
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPCB Laminate FR-4Ceramic Alumina 96%Aluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Magnesium AZ31B-H24Silicon
Strength against density

Related comparisons