Materials / Compare

Magnesium AZ91D vs. Plastic PLA

Compare Magnesium AZ91D vs. Plastic PLA strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Magnesium AZ91DCast
Plastic PLA3D printed (FDM)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength150MPasourcetypical, 0.2% tensile yield, ambient temperature52.5MPasourcetypical
Ultimate tensile strength230MPasourcetypical, ambient temperature52.5MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)
Flexural strengthnot sourced96.8MPasourcetypical
Elongation at break3%sourcetypical, ambient temperature7.8%sourcetypical
Young's modulus (stiffness)45GPasourcetypical13.8x stiffer3.25GPasourcetypical
Density1,810kg/m³sourcetypical1,240kg/m³sourcetypical46% lighter
Strength to weight82.9kN·m/kg1.96x higher42.3kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight24.9MN·m/kg9.49x higher2.62MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.35sourcebase material: AZ91C casting (MIL-HDBK-5J handbook physical constant)not sourced
Shear modulus16.7GPanot sourced
Bulk modulus50GPanot sourced
Speed of sound4,986m/s1,619m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity72W/m·Ksourcetypical0.13W/m·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C
Thermal expansion25µm/m·Ksourcetypical, temperature range not statednot sourced
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing125µm growthnot sourced
Specific heat1,050J/kg·Ksourcetypical1,200J/kg·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)37.9mm²/s434x faster0.0874mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance6,240W/mnot sourced
Melting point470–595°Csourcemelting range152°Csourcetypical
Glass transitionnot sourced59.1°Csourcetypical
Max service temperaturenot sourced58.8°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)
Values forELEKTRON AZ91D magnesium die-casting alloy, as cast; Magnesium Elektron datasheet 475 (7/01), typical properties; Poisson from MIL-HDBK-5J for AZ91C castings.Ultimaker PLA, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat) orientation; Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS dated April 20, 2022.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Plastic PLA is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Magnesium AZ91D stronger than Plastic PLA?

Magnesium AZ91D is stronger: its yield strength is 150 MPa against 52.5 MPa for Plastic PLA (2.86x).

Which is lighter, Magnesium AZ91D or Plastic PLA?

Plastic PLA is lighter: 1,240 kg/m³ against 1,810 kg/m³ for Magnesium AZ91D.

Which is stiffer, Magnesium AZ91D or Plastic PLA?

Magnesium AZ91D is stiffer: Young's modulus 45 GPa against 3.25 GPa for Plastic PLA, so the same part in Magnesium AZ91D deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Magnesium AZ91D or Plastic PLA?

For the same stiffness or strength: Magnesium AZ91D is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beMagnesium AZ91DPlastic PLA
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter9.49x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter2.55x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter1.65x heavier
Strong rod or tielighter1.96x heavier
Strong beamlighter38% heavier
Strong panel or platelighter16% heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Magnesium AZ91D or Plastic PLA?

Magnesium AZ91D conducts heat better: 72 W/m·K against 0.13 W/m·K for Plastic PLA.

Among 72 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Ceramic Aluminum NitrideAluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Solder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Magnesium AZ91DPlastic PLA
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Aluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Solder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Magnesium AZ91DPlastic PLA
Strength against density

Related comparisons