Materials / Compare
Magnesium AZ91D vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
Compare Magnesium AZ91D vs. Plastic Polycarbonate strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 150MPasourcetypical, 0.2% tensile yield, ambient temperature | 65MPasourcetypical, tensile yield |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 230MPasourcetypical, ambient temperature | 65MPasourcetypical, stress at break |
| Flexural strength | not sourced | 97MPasourcetypical, flexural strength |
| Elongation at break | 3%sourcetypical, ambient temperature | 125%sourcetypical, strain at break |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 45GPasourcetypical18.8x stiffer | 2.4GPasourcetypical |
| Density | 1,810kg/m³sourcetypical | 1,200kg/m³sourcetypical1.51x lighter |
| Strength to weight | 82.9kN·m/kg1.53x higher | 54.2kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 24.9MN·m/kg12.4x higher | 2MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.35sourcebase material: AZ91C casting (MIL-HDBK-5J handbook physical constant) | 0.38sourcetypical, polycarbonate family (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1) |
| Shear modulus | 16.7GPa19.2x stiffer in shear | 0.87GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 50GPa | 3.33GPa |
| Speed of sound | 4,986m/s | 1,414m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 72W/m·Ksourcetypical | 0.2W/m·Ksourcetypical, through-plane, 23 C |
| Thermal expansion | 25µm/m·Ksourcetypical, temperature range not stated | 65µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 23-55 C, parallel and normal |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 125µm growth2.6x less | 325µm growth |
| Specific heat | 1,050J/kg·Ksourcetypical | 1,172J/kg·Ksourcetypical (guide value), Bayer ASTM datasheet for Makrolon 2405, ASTM D 2766 |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 37.9mm²/s266x faster | 0.142mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 6,240W/m121x more resistant | 51.7W/m |
| Melting point | 470–595°Csourcemelting range | not sourced |
| Glass transition | not sourced | 144°Csourcetypical, DSC 10 C/min |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 125°CsourceUL 746B RTI, tensile strength, 1.5 mm |
| Values for | ELEKTRON AZ91D magnesium die-casting alloy, as cast; Magnesium Elektron datasheet 475 (7/01), typical properties; Poisson from MIL-HDBK-5J for AZ91C castings. | Covestro Makrolon 2405 general-purpose PC (MVR 19), Covestro technical datasheet version 2026-09-28, typical values |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is Magnesium AZ91D stronger than Plastic Polycarbonate?
Magnesium AZ91D is stronger: its yield strength is 150 MPa against 65 MPa for Plastic Polycarbonate (2.31x).
Which is lighter, Magnesium AZ91D or Plastic Polycarbonate?
Plastic Polycarbonate is lighter: 1,200 kg/m³ against 1,810 kg/m³ for Magnesium AZ91D.
Which is stiffer, Magnesium AZ91D or Plastic Polycarbonate?
Magnesium AZ91D is stiffer: Young's modulus 45 GPa against 2.4 GPa for Plastic Polycarbonate, so the same part in Magnesium AZ91D deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Magnesium AZ91D or Plastic Polycarbonate?
For the same stiffness or strength: Magnesium AZ91D is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam.
| Part that must be | Magnesium AZ91D | Plastic Polycarbonate |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 12.4x heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 2.87x heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 1.76x heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 1.53x heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 16% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | about equal | about equal |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Magnesium AZ91D or Plastic Polycarbonate?
Magnesium AZ91D conducts heat better: 72 W/m·K against 0.2 W/m·K for Plastic Polycarbonate.
Which expands less with temperature?
Magnesium AZ91D expands less: 25 µm/m·K against 65 µm/m·K for Plastic Polycarbonate.
Among 72 materials
Related comparisons
- Magnesium AZ91D vs. Magnesium AZ31B-H24
- Magnesium AZ91D vs. Concrete
- Magnesium AZ91D vs. Aluminum A380
- Magnesium AZ91D vs. Aluminum 5052-H32
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Nylon
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. SLA Resin Standard
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. FDM Polycarbonate
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Plastic POM/Acetal