Materials / Compare

Magnesium AZ91D vs. Silicon

Compare Magnesium AZ91D vs. Silicon strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Magnesium AZ91DCast
SiliconGrown single crystal
Try it on a partA sample part to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength150MPasourcetypical, 0.2% tensile yield, ambient temperaturenot given (tensile used)
Ultimate tensile strength230MPasourcetypical, ambient temperature130MPasourcemodulus of rupture (bending fracture stress); brittle, no yield point
Flexural strengthnot sourced130MPasourcemodulus of rupture
Elongation at break3%sourcetypical, ambient temperaturenot sourced
Young's modulus (stiffness)45GPasourcetypical131GPasourcetypical (single quoted value of an anisotropic crystal)
Density1,810kg/m³sourcetypical29% lighter2,329kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight82.9kN·m/kg48% higher55.8kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight24.9MN·m/kg56.2MN·m/kg2.26x higher
Poisson's ratio0.35sourcebase material: AZ91C casting (MIL-HDBK-5J handbook physical constant)0.221sourcetypical
Shear modulus16.7GPa53.6GPa3.22x stiffer in shear
Bulk modulus50GPa78.3GPa
Speed of sound4,986m/s7,500m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity72W/m·Ksourcetypical163W/m·Ksourcetypical at 313 K (40 °C)
Thermal expansion25µm/m·Ksourcetypical, temperature range not stated2.62µm/m·Ksourcetypical at 300 K
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing125µm growth13.1µm growth9.54x less
Specific heat1,050J/kg·Ksourcetypical732J/kg·Ksourcetypical
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)37.9mm²/s95.6mm²/s2.52x faster
Thermal shock resistance6,240W/m48,095W/m7.71x more resistant
Melting point470–595°Csourcemelting range1,412°Csourcetypical
Max service temperaturenot sourced300°Csourceproducer's maximum application temperature (optical components)
Values forELEKTRON AZ91D magnesium die-casting alloy, as cast; Magnesium Elektron datasheet 475 (7/01), typical properties; Poisson from MIL-HDBK-5J for AZ91C castings.Synthetic single-crystal silicon (cubic, diamond structure), Korth Kristalle (crystal grower) material data; Korth usually supplies Floating Zone (FZ) material, Czochralski (Cz) also offered. Silicon is elastically anisotropic; the producer quotes one modulus and the solver is isotropic.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Magnesium AZ91D stronger than Silicon?

Magnesium AZ91D is stronger: its yield strength is 150 MPa against tensile strength 130 MPa for Silicon (15%).

Which is lighter, Magnesium AZ91D or Silicon?

Magnesium AZ91D is lighter: 1,810 kg/m³ against 2,329 kg/m³ for Silicon.

Which is stiffer, Magnesium AZ91D or Silicon?

Silicon is stiffer: Young's modulus 131 GPa against 45 GPa for Magnesium AZ91D, so the same part in Silicon deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Magnesium AZ91D or Silicon?

For the same stiffness or strength: Magnesium AZ91D is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Silicon is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate.

Part that must beMagnesium AZ91DSilicon
Stiff rod or tie (tension)2.26x heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)33% heavierlighter
Stiff panel or plate11% heavierlighter
Strong rod or tielighter48% heavier
Strong beamlighter42% heavier
Strong panel or platelighter38% heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Magnesium AZ91D or Silicon?

Silicon conducts heat better: 163 W/m·K against 72 W/m·K for Magnesium AZ91D.

Which expands less with temperature?

Silicon expands less: 2.62 µm/m·K against 25 µm/m·K for Magnesium AZ91D.

Among 72 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPCB Laminate FR-4Ceramic Alumina 96%Ceramic Aluminum NitrideAluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Solder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Magnesium AZ91DSilicon
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPCB Laminate FR-4Ceramic Alumina 96%Aluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Solder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Magnesium AZ91DSilicon
Strength against density

Related comparisons