Materials / Compare
PCB Laminate FR-4 vs. Stainless Steel 17-4PH
Compare PCB Laminate FR-4 vs. Stainless Steel 17-4PH strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA sample part to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | not given (tensile used) | 1,275MPasourcetypical, transverse, sheet/strip |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 246–385MPasourcetypical, in-plane: cross direction .. length direction (ASTM D3039) | 1,379MPasourcetypical, transverse, sheet/strip |
| Flexural strength | 531–621MPasourcetypical: cross direction .. length direction (IPC-TM-650 2.4.4B) | not sourced |
| Elongation at break | not sourced | 9%sourcetypical, transverse, in 2 in. (50.8 mm) |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 21.9–25.8GPasourcetypical, in-plane: cross direction .. length direction (ASTM D790-15e2) | 197GPasourceH 900 |
| Density | 1,920kg/m³sourcetypical, 50% resin content; another FR-4 producer: Park Nelco N4000-6 (high-Tg multifunctional epoxy), not Isola 370HR | 7,800kg/m³sourceH 900 |
| Strength to weight | 164kN·m/kg | 163kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 12.4MN·m/kg | 25.3MN·m/kg2.03x higher |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.171–0.177sourcetypical, in-plane: cross direction .. length direction | 0.272sourceH 900 (column) |
| Shear modulus | 10.2GPa | 77.4GPa7.62x stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 12.2GPa | 144GPa |
| Speed of sound | 3,525m/s | 5,026m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.4W/m·Ksourcetypical (ASTM E1952); direction not stated by the sheet | 17.9W/m·Ksourceat 149 °C (300 °F), H 900 |
| Thermal expansion | 13–14µm/m·Ksourcetypical, in-plane X/Y-axis, below Tg (IPC-TM-650 2.4.24C) | 10.8µm/m·Ksourcemean, 21–93 °C (70–200 °F), H 900 |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 67.5µm growth | 54µm growth25% less |
| Specific heat | 1,200–1,400J/kg·Ksourcetypical (ASTM E1461); another FR-4 producer: Park Nelco N4000-6 (high-Tg multifunctional epoxy), not Isola 370HR | 460J/kg·Ksourcemean, 0–100 °C, H 900 |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 0.16mm²/s | 4.99mm²/s31.1x faster |
| Thermal shock resistance | 324W/m | 7,809W/m24.1x more resistant |
| Glass transition | 180°Csourcetypical, DSC (IPC-TM-650 2.4.25C) | not sourced |
| Max service temperature | 130°CsourceUL Relative Thermal Index (UL 796) | 316°Csourcestrength-retention limit (not oxidation) |
| Values for | Isola 370HR FR-4 laminate (Polyclad PCL-FR-370HR, 180 C Tg multifunctional epoxy, E-glass fabric), copper removed; Isola data sheet Revision C, last updated April 15, 2021. Woven-glass laminate: the sheet gives in-plane values per weave direction (length / cross) and the Z-axis CTE separately; the solver is isotropic per material. | Cleveland-Cliffs 17-4 PH, Condition H 900, sheet/strip, transverse (Product Data Bulletin, May 2021) |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is PCB Laminate FR-4 stronger than Stainless Steel 17-4PH?
Stainless Steel 17-4PH is stronger: its yield strength is 1,275 MPa against tensile strength 315 MPa for PCB Laminate FR-4 (4.04x).
Which is lighter, PCB Laminate FR-4 or Stainless Steel 17-4PH?
PCB Laminate FR-4 is lighter: 1,920 kg/m³ against 7,800 kg/m³ for Stainless Steel 17-4PH.
Which is stiffer, PCB Laminate FR-4 or Stainless Steel 17-4PH?
Stainless Steel 17-4PH is stiffer: Young's modulus 197 GPa against 23.9 GPa for PCB Laminate FR-4, so the same part in Stainless Steel 17-4PH deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, PCB Laminate FR-4 or Stainless Steel 17-4PH?
For the same stiffness or strength: PCB Laminate FR-4 is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Stainless Steel 17-4PH is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension).
| Part that must be | PCB Laminate FR-4 | Stainless Steel 17-4PH |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 2.03x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 41% heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 2.01x heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | about equal | about equal |
| Strong beam | lighter | 1.6x heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 2.02x heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, PCB Laminate FR-4 or Stainless Steel 17-4PH?
Stainless Steel 17-4PH conducts heat better: 17.9 W/m·K against 0.4 W/m·K for PCB Laminate FR-4.
Which expands less with temperature?
Stainless Steel 17-4PH expands less: 10.8 µm/m·K against 13.5 µm/m·K for PCB Laminate FR-4.
Among 72 materials
Related comparisons
- PCB Laminate FR-4 vs. Concrete
- PCB Laminate FR-4 vs. Plastic PPS GF40
- PCB Laminate FR-4 vs. Magnesium AZ31B-H24
- PCB Laminate FR-4 vs. Magnesium AZ91D
- Stainless Steel 17-4PH vs. Nickel Inconel 718
- Stainless Steel 17-4PH vs. Steel AISI 4340
- Stainless Steel 17-4PH vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Stainless Steel 17-4PH vs. DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium