Materials / Compare
PCB Laminate FR-4 vs. Zinc Zamak 3
Compare PCB Laminate FR-4 vs. Zinc Zamak 3 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA sample part to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | not given (tensile used) | 221MPasourcetypical |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 246–385MPasourcetypical, in-plane: cross direction .. length direction (ASTM D3039) | 283MPasourcetypical |
| Flexural strength | 531–621MPasourcetypical: cross direction .. length direction (IPC-TM-650 2.4.4B) | not sourced |
| Elongation at break | not sourced | 10%sourcetypical, in 2 in. |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 21.9–25.8GPasourcetypical, in-plane: cross direction .. length direction (ASTM D790-15e2) | 85.5GPasourcetypical |
| Density | 1,920kg/m³sourcetypical, 50% resin content; another FR-4 producer: Park Nelco N4000-6 (high-Tg multifunctional epoxy), not Isola 370HR | 6,600kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 164kN·m/kg4.91x higher | 33.5kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 12.4MN·m/kg | 13MN·m/kg4% higher |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.171–0.177sourcetypical, in-plane: cross direction .. length direction | 0.27sourcetypical, Zamak 3 hot-chamber die cast |
| Shear modulus | 10.2GPa | 33.7GPa3.31x stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 12.2GPa | 62GPa |
| Speed of sound | 3,525m/s | 3,599m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.4W/m·Ksourcetypical (ASTM E1952); direction not stated by the sheet | 113W/m·Ksourcetypical |
| Thermal expansion | 13–14µm/m·Ksourcetypical, in-plane X/Y-axis, below Tg (IPC-TM-650 2.4.24C) | 27.4µm/m·Ksourcetypical |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 67.5µm growth2.03x less | 137µm growth |
| Specific heat | 1,200–1,400J/kg·Ksourcetypical (ASTM E1461); another FR-4 producer: Park Nelco N4000-6 (high-Tg multifunctional epoxy), not Isola 370HR | 419J/kg·Ksourcetypical |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 0.16mm²/s | 40.9mm²/s255x faster |
| Thermal shock resistance | 324W/m | 7,782W/m24.1x more resistant |
| Melting point | not sourced | 381–387°Csourcemelting range |
| Glass transition | 180°Csourcetypical, DSC (IPC-TM-650 2.4.25C) | not sourced |
| Max service temperature | 130°CsourceUL Relative Thermal Index (UL 796) | not sourced |
| Values for | Isola 370HR FR-4 laminate (Polyclad PCL-FR-370HR, 180 C Tg multifunctional epoxy, E-glass fabric), copper removed; Isola data sheet Revision C, last updated April 15, 2021. Woven-glass laminate: the sheet gives in-plane values per weave direction (length / cross) and the Z-axis CTE separately; the solver is isotropic per material. | Zamak 3 (ASTM B86 die cast), Nathan Trotter (zinc alloy producer) technical data sheet, typical values |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is PCB Laminate FR-4 stronger than Zinc Zamak 3?
PCB Laminate FR-4 is stronger: its tensile strength is 315 MPa against yield strength 221 MPa for Zinc Zamak 3 (43%).
Which is lighter, PCB Laminate FR-4 or Zinc Zamak 3?
PCB Laminate FR-4 is lighter: 1,920 kg/m³ against 6,600 kg/m³ for Zinc Zamak 3.
Which is stiffer, PCB Laminate FR-4 or Zinc Zamak 3?
Zinc Zamak 3 is stiffer: Young's modulus 85.5 GPa against 23.9 GPa for PCB Laminate FR-4, so the same part in Zinc Zamak 3 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, PCB Laminate FR-4 or Zinc Zamak 3?
For the same stiffness or strength: PCB Laminate FR-4 is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Zinc Zamak 3 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension).
| Part that must be | PCB Laminate FR-4 | Zinc Zamak 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 4% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 1.82x heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 2.25x heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 4.91x heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 4.36x heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 4.11x heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, PCB Laminate FR-4 or Zinc Zamak 3?
Zinc Zamak 3 conducts heat better: 113 W/m·K against 0.4 W/m·K for PCB Laminate FR-4.
Which expands less with temperature?
PCB Laminate FR-4 expands less: 13.5 µm/m·K against 27.4 µm/m·K for Zinc Zamak 3.