Materials / Compare
Plastic PETG vs. Steel AISI 4340
Compare Plastic PETG vs. Steel AISI 4340 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 46.2MPasourcetypical | 1,035MPasourcetypical, transverse |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 46.2MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield) | 1,140MPasourcetypical, transverse |
| Flexural strength | 78.9MPasourcetypical | not sourced |
| Elongation at break | 7.6%sourcetypical | 18%sourcetypical, transverse |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 1.94GPasourcetypical | 200GPasourceMIL-HDBK-5J design value (AISI 4340, quenched and tempered) |
| Density | 1,270kg/m³sourcetypical6.17x lighter | 7,840kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 36.4kN·m/kg | 132kN·m/kg3.63x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 1.53MN·m/kg | 25.5MN·m/kg16.7x higher |
| Poisson's ratio | not sourced | 0.32sourceMIL-HDBK-5J design value (AISI 4340, quenched and tempered) |
| Shear modulus | not sourced | 75.7GPa |
| Bulk modulus | not sourced | 185GPa |
| Speed of sound | 1,236m/s | 5,049m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.21W/m·Ksourcebase material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), typical | 37.5W/m·Ksourcetypical |
| Thermal expansion | 51µm/m·Ksourcebase material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), typical | 11.3µm/m·Ksourcemean, -18 to 93 °C |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 255µm growth | 56.5µm growth4.51x less |
| Specific heat | 1,300J/kg·Ksourcebase material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), DSC at 60 °C (lowest temperature listed) | 448J/kg·Ksourcetypical |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 0.127mm²/s | 10.7mm²/s83.9x faster |
| Thermal shock resistance | not sourced | 11,678W/m |
| Glass transition | 77.4°Csourcetypical | not sourced |
| Max service temperature | 76.2°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens) | not sourced |
| Values for | Ultimaker PETG, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS v1.00, April 29, 2022. | Carpenter (Latrobe) Lescalloy 4340 VAC-ARC datasheet; mechanical row for 1100 °F temper; physical properties grade-level |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Plastic PETG is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is Plastic PETG stronger than Steel AISI 4340?
Steel AISI 4340 is stronger: its yield strength is 1,035 MPa against 46.2 MPa for Plastic PETG (22.4x).
Which is lighter, Plastic PETG or Steel AISI 4340?
Plastic PETG is lighter: 1,270 kg/m³ against 7,840 kg/m³ for Steel AISI 4340.
Which is stiffer, Plastic PETG or Steel AISI 4340?
Steel AISI 4340 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 1.94 GPa for Plastic PETG, so the same part in Steel AISI 4340 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic PETG or Steel AISI 4340?
For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic PETG is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong panel or plate; Steel AISI 4340 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam.
| Part that must be | Plastic PETG | Steel AISI 4340 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 16.7x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 1.64x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 32% heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | 3.63x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 29% heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 30% heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Plastic PETG or Steel AISI 4340?
Steel AISI 4340 conducts heat better: 37.5 W/m·K against 0.21 W/m·K for Plastic PETG.
Which expands less with temperature?
Steel AISI 4340 expands less: 11.3 µm/m·K against 51 µm/m·K for Plastic PETG.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Plastic PETG vs. SLA Resin Tough 2000
- Plastic PETG vs. Plastic ABS
- Plastic PETG vs. FDM Polycarbonate
- Plastic PETG vs. Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)
- Steel AISI 4340 vs. Nickel Inconel 718
- Steel AISI 4340 vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Steel AISI 4340 vs. Stainless 17-4PH
- Steel AISI 4340 vs. Steel AISI 1045