Materials / Compare

Plastic PETG vs. Steel A992

Compare Plastic PETG vs. Steel A992 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Plastic PETG3D printed (FDM)
Steel A992Wrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength46.2MPasourcetypical385MPasourcetypical: mean of 20,295 A992 flange mill-test coupons (1998 SSPC survey), as reported by AISC
Ultimate tensile strength46.2MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)505MPasourcetypical: mean of 20,295 A992 flange mill-test coupons (1998 SSPC survey)
Flexural strength78.9MPasourcetypicalnot sourced
Elongation at break7.6%sourcetypicalnot sourced
Young's modulus (stiffness)1.94GPasourcetypical200GPasourcedesign value (AISC 360-16)
Density1,270kg/m³sourcetypical7,850kg/m³sourcenominal (constructional data)
Strength to weight36.4kN·m/kg49kN·m/kg35% higher
Stiffness to weight1.53MN·m/kg25.5MN·m/kg16.7x higher
Poisson's rationot sourced0.3sourcedesign value (AISC 360-16 Commentary)
Shear modulusnot sourced76.9GPa
Bulk modulusnot sourced167GPa
Speed of sound1,236m/s5,048m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.21W/m·Ksourcebase material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), typical48W/m·Ksourcenominal at 20 °C
Thermal expansion51µm/m·Ksourcebase material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), typical12µm/m·Ksourcenominal (constructional data, no temperature range stated)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing255µm growth60µm growth4.25x less
Specific heat1,300J/kg·Ksourcebase material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), DSC at 60 °C (lowest temperature listed)460–480J/kg·Ksourcebase material: EN S275JR unalloyed structural steel (the EN counterpart of A36), typical, 50/100 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)0.127mm²/s13mm²/s102x faster
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced5,390W/m
Glass transition77.4°Csourcetypicalnot sourced
Max service temperature76.2°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)not sourced
Values forUltimaker PETG, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS v1.00, April 29, 2022.ASTM A992 W-shapes; Fy/Fu specified minimums from AISC publications (AISC 360-16 Commentary; Modern Steel Construction); elastic constants AISC 360; physical constants from the bauforumstahl structural-steel EPD, which names A992 among covered product standards.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Plastic PETG is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Plastic PETG stronger than Steel A992?

Steel A992 is stronger: its yield strength is 385 MPa against 46.2 MPa for Plastic PETG (8.33x).

Which is lighter, Plastic PETG or Steel A992?

Plastic PETG is lighter: 1,270 kg/m³ against 7,850 kg/m³ for Steel A992.

Which is stiffer, Plastic PETG or Steel A992?

Steel A992 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 1.94 GPa for Plastic PETG, so the same part in Steel A992 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic PETG or Steel A992?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic PETG is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Steel A992 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie.

Part that must bePlastic PETGSteel A992
Stiff rod or tie (tension)16.7x heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)1.64x heavierlighter
Stiff panel or platelighter32% heavier
Strong rod or tie35% heavierlighter
Strong beamlighter1.5x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter2.14x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Plastic PETG or Steel A992?

Steel A992 conducts heat better: 48 W/m·K against 0.21 W/m·K for Plastic PETG.

Which expands less with temperature?

Steel A992 expands less: 12 µm/m·K against 51 µm/m·K for Plastic PETG.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPlastic PETGSteel A992
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPlastic PETGSteel A992
Strength against density

Related comparisons