Materials / Compare

Plastic PLA vs. Stainless 17-4PH

Compare Plastic PLA vs. Stainless 17-4PH strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Plastic PLA3D printed (FDM)
Stainless 17-4PHWrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength52.5MPasourcetypical1,275MPasourcetypical, transverse, sheet/strip
Ultimate tensile strength52.5MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)1,379MPasourcetypical, transverse, sheet/strip
Flexural strength96.8MPasourcetypicalnot sourced
Elongation at break7.8%sourcetypical9%sourcetypical, transverse, in 2 in. (50.8 mm)
Young's modulus (stiffness)3.25GPasourcetypical197GPasourceH 900
Density1,240kg/m³sourcetypical7,800kg/m³sourceH 900
Strength to weight42.3kN·m/kg163kN·m/kg3.86x higher
Stiffness to weight2.62MN·m/kg25.3MN·m/kg9.64x higher
Poisson's rationot sourced0.272sourceH 900 (column)
Shear modulusnot sourced77.4GPa
Bulk modulusnot sourced144GPa
Speed of sound1,619m/s5,026m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.13W/m·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C17.9W/m·Ksourceat 149 °C (300 °F), H 900
Thermal expansionnot sourced10.8µm/m·Ksourcemean, 21–93 °C (70–200 °F), H 900
100 mm part over a 50 °C swingnot sourced54µm growth
Specific heat1,200J/kg·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C460J/kg·Ksourcemean, 0–100 °C, H 900
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)0.0874mm²/s4.99mm²/s57.1x faster
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced7,809W/m
Melting point152°Csourcetypicalnot sourced
Glass transition59.1°Csourcetypicalnot sourced
Max service temperature58.8°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)316°Csourcestrength-retention limit (not oxidation)
Values forUltimaker PLA, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat) orientation; Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS dated April 20, 2022.Cleveland-Cliffs 17-4 PH, Condition H 900, sheet/strip, transverse (Product Data Bulletin, May 2021)

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Plastic PLA is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Plastic PLA stronger than Stainless 17-4PH?

Stainless 17-4PH is stronger: its yield strength is 1,275 MPa against 52.5 MPa for Plastic PLA (24.3x).

Which is lighter, Plastic PLA or Stainless 17-4PH?

Plastic PLA is lighter: 1,240 kg/m³ against 7,800 kg/m³ for Stainless 17-4PH.

Which is stiffer, Plastic PLA or Stainless 17-4PH?

Stainless 17-4PH is stiffer: Young's modulus 197 GPa against 3.25 GPa for Plastic PLA, so the same part in Stainless 17-4PH deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic PLA or Stainless 17-4PH?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic PLA is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong panel or plate; Stainless 17-4PH is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam.

Part that must bePlastic PLAStainless 17-4PH
Stiff rod or tie (tension)9.64x heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)24% heavierlighter
Stiff panel or platelighter1.6x heavier
Strong rod or tie3.86x heavierlighter
Strong beam33% heavierlighter
Strong panel or platelighter28% heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Plastic PLA or Stainless 17-4PH?

Stainless 17-4PH conducts heat better: 17.9 W/m·K against 0.13 W/m·K for Plastic PLA.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Aluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPlastic PLAStainless 17-4PH
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Aluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPlastic PLAStainless 17-4PH
Strength against density

Related comparisons