Materials / Compare
Plastic PLA vs. Stainless 17-4PH
Compare Plastic PLA vs. Stainless 17-4PH strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 52.5MPasourcetypical | 1,275MPasourcetypical, transverse, sheet/strip |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 52.5MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield) | 1,379MPasourcetypical, transverse, sheet/strip |
| Flexural strength | 96.8MPasourcetypical | not sourced |
| Elongation at break | 7.8%sourcetypical | 9%sourcetypical, transverse, in 2 in. (50.8 mm) |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 3.25GPasourcetypical | 197GPasourceH 900 |
| Density | 1,240kg/m³sourcetypical | 7,800kg/m³sourceH 900 |
| Strength to weight | 42.3kN·m/kg | 163kN·m/kg3.86x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 2.62MN·m/kg | 25.3MN·m/kg9.64x higher |
| Poisson's ratio | not sourced | 0.272sourceH 900 (column) |
| Shear modulus | not sourced | 77.4GPa |
| Bulk modulus | not sourced | 144GPa |
| Speed of sound | 1,619m/s | 5,026m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.13W/m·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C | 17.9W/m·Ksourceat 149 °C (300 °F), H 900 |
| Thermal expansion | not sourced | 10.8µm/m·Ksourcemean, 21–93 °C (70–200 °F), H 900 |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | not sourced | 54µm growth |
| Specific heat | 1,200J/kg·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C | 460J/kg·Ksourcemean, 0–100 °C, H 900 |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 0.0874mm²/s | 4.99mm²/s57.1x faster |
| Thermal shock resistance | not sourced | 7,809W/m |
| Melting point | 152°Csourcetypical | not sourced |
| Glass transition | 59.1°Csourcetypical | not sourced |
| Max service temperature | 58.8°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens) | 316°Csourcestrength-retention limit (not oxidation) |
| Values for | Ultimaker PLA, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat) orientation; Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS dated April 20, 2022. | Cleveland-Cliffs 17-4 PH, Condition H 900, sheet/strip, transverse (Product Data Bulletin, May 2021) |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Plastic PLA is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is Plastic PLA stronger than Stainless 17-4PH?
Stainless 17-4PH is stronger: its yield strength is 1,275 MPa against 52.5 MPa for Plastic PLA (24.3x).
Which is lighter, Plastic PLA or Stainless 17-4PH?
Plastic PLA is lighter: 1,240 kg/m³ against 7,800 kg/m³ for Stainless 17-4PH.
Which is stiffer, Plastic PLA or Stainless 17-4PH?
Stainless 17-4PH is stiffer: Young's modulus 197 GPa against 3.25 GPa for Plastic PLA, so the same part in Stainless 17-4PH deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic PLA or Stainless 17-4PH?
For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic PLA is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong panel or plate; Stainless 17-4PH is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam.
| Part that must be | Plastic PLA | Stainless 17-4PH |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 9.64x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 24% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 1.6x heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | 3.86x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 33% heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 28% heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Plastic PLA or Stainless 17-4PH?
Stainless 17-4PH conducts heat better: 17.9 W/m·K against 0.13 W/m·K for Plastic PLA.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Plastic PLA vs. SLA Resin Standard
- Plastic PLA vs. FDM Polycarbonate
- Plastic PLA vs. Plastic POM/Acetal
- Plastic PLA vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
- Stainless 17-4PH vs. Nickel Inconel 718
- Stainless 17-4PH vs. Steel AISI 4340
- Stainless 17-4PH vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Stainless 17-4PH vs. DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium