Materials / Compare

Plastic PLA vs. Titanium Ti-6Al-4V

Compare Plastic PLA vs. Titanium Ti-6Al-4V strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Plastic PLA3D printed (FDM)
Titanium Ti-6Al-4VWrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength52.5MPasourcetypical885MPasourcetypical, plate (>0.187 in), annealed, 0.2% offset
Ultimate tensile strength52.5MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)940MPasourcetypical, plate, annealed
Flexural strength96.8MPasourcetypicalnot sourced
Elongation at break7.8%sourcetypical16%sourcetypical, in 2 in., plate annealed
Young's modulus (stiffness)3.25GPasourcetypical107–122GPasourcetypical range, 20 °C
Density1,240kg/m³sourcetypical4,430kg/m³sourcenominal
Strength to weight42.3kN·m/kg200kN·m/kg4.72x higher
Stiffness to weight2.62MN·m/kg25.8MN·m/kg9.86x higher
Poisson's rationot sourced0.342sourcemean of TIMET measurements
Shear modulusnot sourced42.7GPa
Bulk modulusnot sourced121GPa
Speed of sound1,619m/s5,084m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.13W/m·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C6.6W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C, mill annealed
Thermal expansionnot sourced9µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 0-100 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swingnot sourced45µm growth
Specific heat1,200J/kg·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C580J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)0.0874mm²/s2.57mm²/s29.4x faster
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced3,730W/m
Melting point152°Csourcetypical1,630–1,650°Csourcemelting range
Glass transition59.1°Csourcetypicalnot sourced
Max service temperature58.8°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)400°Csourceupper recommended use temperature
Values forUltimaker PLA, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat) orientation; Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS dated April 20, 2022.TIMETAL 6-4 (Ti-6Al-4V Grade 5) annealed plate typical (TIMET properties manual) + TIMET datasheet TMC-0150 physical properties

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Plastic PLA is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Plastic PLA stronger than Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?

Titanium Ti-6Al-4V is stronger: its yield strength is 885 MPa against 52.5 MPa for Plastic PLA (16.9x).

Which is lighter, Plastic PLA or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?

Plastic PLA is lighter: 1,240 kg/m³ against 4,430 kg/m³ for Titanium Ti-6Al-4V.

Which is stiffer, Plastic PLA or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?

Titanium Ti-6Al-4V is stiffer: Young's modulus 115 GPa against 3.25 GPa for Plastic PLA, so the same part in Titanium Ti-6Al-4V deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic PLA or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic PLA is lighter for a stiff panel or plate; Titanium Ti-6Al-4V is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must bePlastic PLATitanium Ti-6Al-4V
Stiff rod or tie (tension)9.86x heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)1.66x heavierlighter
Stiff panel or platelighter9% heavier
Strong rod or tie4.72x heavierlighter
Strong beam1.84x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate15% heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Plastic PLA or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?

Titanium Ti-6Al-4V conducts heat better: 6.6 W/m·K against 0.13 W/m·K for Plastic PLA.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Brass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPlastic PLATitanium Ti-6Al-4V
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Brass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPlastic PLATitanium Ti-6Al-4V
Strength against density

Related comparisons