Materials / Compare
Plastic PMMA vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
Compare Plastic PMMA vs. Plastic Polycarbonate strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | not given (tensile used) | 65MPasourcetypical, tensile yield |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 80MPasourcetypical, 23 °C | 65MPasourcetypical, stress at break |
| Compressive strength | 110MPasourcecompressive yield stress, typical | not sourced |
| Flexural strength | 115MPasourcetypical | 97MPasourcetypical, flexural strength |
| Elongation at break | 5.5%sourcetypical | 125%sourcetypical, strain at break |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 3.3GPasourcetypical, short-term | 2.4GPasourcetypical |
| Density | 1,190kg/m³sourcetypical | 1,200kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 67.2kN·m/kg24% higher | 54.2kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 2.77MN·m/kg39% higher | 2MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.37sourcetypical | 0.38sourcetypical, polycarbonate family (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1) |
| Shear modulus | 1.2GPa39% stiffer in shear | 0.87GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 4.23GPa | 3.33GPa |
| Speed of sound | 1,665m/s | 1,414m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.19W/m·Ksourcetypical | 0.2W/m·Ksourcetypical, through-plane, 23 C |
| Thermal expansion | 70µm/m·Ksource0-50 °C | 65µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 23-55 C, parallel and normal |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 350µm growth | 325µm growth8% less |
| Specific heat | 1,470J/kg·Ksourcetypical | 1,172J/kg·Ksourcetypical (guide value), Bayer ASTM datasheet for Makrolon 2405, ASTM D 2766 |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 0.109mm²/s | 0.142mm²/s31% faster |
| Thermal shock resistance | 41.5W/m | 51.7W/m25% more resistant |
| Glass transition | not sourced | 144°Csourcetypical, DSC 10 C/min |
| Max service temperature | 80°Csourcemax. permanent service temperature | 125°CsourceUL 746B RTI, tensile strength, 1.5 mm |
| Values for | Röhm PLEXIGLAS GS 0F00 cast acrylic sheet, typical values at 23 °C / 50 % RH (Röhm Technical Information Ref. No. 211-1) | Covestro Makrolon 2405 general-purpose PC (MVR 19), Covestro technical datasheet version 2026-09-28, typical values |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is Plastic PMMA stronger than Plastic Polycarbonate?
Plastic PMMA is stronger: its tensile strength is 80 MPa against yield strength 65 MPa for Plastic Polycarbonate (23%).
Which is lighter, Plastic PMMA or Plastic Polycarbonate?
Plastic PMMA is lighter: 1,190 kg/m³ against 1,200 kg/m³ for Plastic Polycarbonate.
Which is stiffer, Plastic PMMA or Plastic Polycarbonate?
Plastic PMMA is stiffer: Young's modulus 3.3 GPa against 2.4 GPa for Plastic Polycarbonate, so the same part in Plastic PMMA deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic PMMA or Plastic Polycarbonate?
For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic PMMA is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | Plastic PMMA | Plastic Polycarbonate |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 39% heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 18% heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 12% heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 24% heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 16% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 12% heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Plastic PMMA or Plastic Polycarbonate?
Plastic Polycarbonate conducts heat better: 0.2 W/m·K against 0.19 W/m·K for Plastic PMMA.
Which expands less with temperature?
Plastic Polycarbonate expands less: 65 µm/m·K against 70 µm/m·K for Plastic PMMA.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Plastic PMMA vs. Plastic Nylon PA66
- Plastic PMMA vs. Plastic Nylon PA6
- Plastic PMMA vs. FDM PAHT-CF
- Plastic PMMA vs. Plastic POM/Acetal
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Nylon
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. SLA Resin Standard
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. FDM Polycarbonate
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Plastic POM/Acetal