Materials / Compare

Plastic Polycarbonate vs. SLA Resin Tough 2000

Compare Plastic Polycarbonate vs. SLA Resin Tough 2000 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Plastic PolycarbonateBulk polymer (molded or machined)
SLA Resin Tough 20003D printed (SLA resin)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength65MPasourcetypical, tensile yield40.4MPasourcetypical
Ultimate tensile strength65MPasourcetypical, stress at break40.4MPasourcetypical
Flexural strength97MPasourcetypical, flexural strength67MPasourcetypical
Elongation at break125%sourcetypical, strain at break79%sourcetypical
Young's modulus (stiffness)2.4GPasourcetypical33% stiffer1.8GPasourcetypical
Density1,200kg/m³sourcetypical1,090kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight54.2kN·m/kg46% higher37.1kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight2MN·m/kg21% higher1.65MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.38sourcetypical, polycarbonate family (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1)not sourced
Shear modulus0.87GPanot sourced
Bulk modulus3.33GPanot sourced
Speed of sound1,414m/s1,285m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.2W/m·Ksourcetypical, through-plane, 23 Cnot sourced
Thermal expansion65µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 23-55 C, parallel and normal134µm/m·Ksourcemean 0-150 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing325µm growth2.06x less671µm growth
Specific heat1,172J/kg·Ksourcetypical (guide value), Bayer ASTM datasheet for Makrolon 2405, ASTM D 2766not sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)0.142mm²/snot sourced
Thermal shock resistance51.7W/mnot sourced
Glass transition144°Csourcetypical, DSC 10 C/min112°CsourceDMA
Max service temperature125°CsourceUL 746B RTI, tensile strength, 1.5 mm57°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa
Values forCovestro Makrolon 2405 general-purpose PC (MVR 19), Covestro technical datasheet version 2026-09-28, typical valuesFormlabs Tough 2000 Resin V2 (FLTO2002), TDS Rev. 01 10/06/2025; printed on Form 4 at 100 µm, washed in Form Wash V2 10+5 min in >=99% IPA, post-cured 70 °C for 12 min in Form Cure V2. Orientation not stated.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

SLA Resin Tough 2000 is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Plastic Polycarbonate stronger than SLA Resin Tough 2000?

Plastic Polycarbonate is stronger: its yield strength is 65 MPa against 40.4 MPa for SLA Resin Tough 2000 (1.61x).

Which is lighter, Plastic Polycarbonate or SLA Resin Tough 2000?

SLA Resin Tough 2000 is lighter: 1,090 kg/m³ against 1,200 kg/m³ for Plastic Polycarbonate.

Which is stiffer, Plastic Polycarbonate or SLA Resin Tough 2000?

Plastic Polycarbonate is stiffer: Young's modulus 2.4 GPa against 1.8 GPa for SLA Resin Tough 2000, so the same part in Plastic Polycarbonate deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic Polycarbonate or SLA Resin Tough 2000?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic Polycarbonate is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must bePlastic PolycarbonateSLA Resin Tough 2000
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter21% heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter5% heavier
Stiff panel or plateabout equalabout equal
Strong rod or tielighter46% heavier
Strong beamlighter25% heavier
Strong panel or platelighter15% heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which expands less with temperature?

Plastic Polycarbonate expands less: 65 µm/m·K against 134 µm/m·K for SLA Resin Tough 2000.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPlastic PolycarbonateSLA Resin Tough 2000
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPlastic PolycarbonateSLA Resin Tough 2000
Strength against density

Related comparisons