Materials / Compare
Plastic Polypropylene vs. Stainless 17-4PH
Compare Plastic Polypropylene vs. Stainless 17-4PH strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 33MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527 | 1,275MPasourcetypical, transverse, sheet/strip |
| Ultimate tensile strength | not sourced | 1,379MPasourcetypical, transverse, sheet/strip |
| Elongation at break | not sourced | 9%sourcetypical, transverse, in 2 in. (50.8 mm) |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 1.45GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527 | 197GPasourceH 900 |
| Density | 900kg/m³sourcetypical, 23 °C ISO 1183-1 | 7,800kg/m³sourceH 900 |
| Strength to weight | 36.7kN·m/kg | 163kN·m/kg4.46x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 1.61MN·m/kg | 25.3MN·m/kg15.7x higher |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.42sourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene) | 0.272sourceH 900 (column) |
| Shear modulus | 0.511GPa | 77.4GPa152x stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 3.02GPa | 144GPa |
| Speed of sound | 1,269m/s | 5,026m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.17–0.22W/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene) | 17.9W/m·Ksourceat 149 °C (300 °F), H 900 |
| Thermal expansion | 80–100µm/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene) | 10.8µm/m·Ksourcemean, 21–93 °C (70–200 °F), H 900 |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 450µm growth | 54µm growth8.33x less |
| Specific heat | not sourced | 460J/kg·Ksourcemean, 0–100 °C, H 900 |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | not sourced | 4.99mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 28.6W/m | 7,809W/m273x more resistant |
| Max service temperature | 90°CsourceHDT 0.45 MPa (ISO 75B), unannealed | 316°Csourcestrength-retention limit (not oxidation) |
| Values for | LyondellBasell Moplen HP501H polypropylene homopolymer (general purpose), typical ISO values | Cleveland-Cliffs 17-4 PH, Condition H 900, sheet/strip, transverse (Product Data Bulletin, May 2021) |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is Plastic Polypropylene stronger than Stainless 17-4PH?
Stainless 17-4PH is stronger: its yield strength is 1,275 MPa against 33 MPa for Plastic Polypropylene (38.6x).
Which is lighter, Plastic Polypropylene or Stainless 17-4PH?
Plastic Polypropylene is lighter: 900 kg/m³ against 7,800 kg/m³ for Stainless 17-4PH.
Which is stiffer, Plastic Polypropylene or Stainless 17-4PH?
Stainless 17-4PH is stiffer: Young's modulus 197 GPa against 1.45 GPa for Plastic Polypropylene, so the same part in Stainless 17-4PH deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic Polypropylene or Stainless 17-4PH?
For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic Polypropylene is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong panel or plate; Stainless 17-4PH is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam.
| Part that must be | Plastic Polypropylene | Stainless 17-4PH |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 15.7x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 34% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 1.69x heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | 4.46x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 32% heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 39% heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Plastic Polypropylene or Stainless 17-4PH?
Stainless 17-4PH conducts heat better: 17.9 W/m·K against 0.195 W/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.
Which expands less with temperature?
Stainless 17-4PH expands less: 10.8 µm/m·K against 90 µm/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. SLA Resin Tough 2000
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. Plastic ABS
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. SLS PA12 Nylon
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. Rubber
- Stainless 17-4PH vs. Nickel Inconel 718
- Stainless 17-4PH vs. Steel AISI 4340
- Stainless 17-4PH vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Stainless 17-4PH vs. DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium