Materials / Compare

Plastic Polypropylene vs. Stainless 316

Compare Plastic Polypropylene vs. Stainless 316 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Plastic PolypropyleneBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Stainless 316Wrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength33MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527265MPasourcetypical (representative), annealed 1.0 mm sheet
Ultimate tensile strengthnot sourced583MPasourcetypical (representative), annealed 1.0 mm sheet
Elongation at breaknot sourced61%sourcetypical (representative), annealed, in 2 in. (51 mm)
Young's modulus (stiffness)1.45GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527200GPasourcetypical, in tension
Density900kg/m³sourcetypical, 23 °C ISO 1183-18,027kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight36.7kN·m/kg11% higher33kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight1.61MN·m/kg24.9MN·m/kg15.5x higher
Poisson's ratio0.42sourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)0.3sourcedesign value (structural stainless steels)
Shear modulus0.511GPa76.9GPa151x stiffer in shear
Bulk modulus3.02GPa167GPa
Speed of sound1,269m/s4,992m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.17–0.22W/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)14.6W/m·Ksource20–100 °C
Thermal expansion80–100µm/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)16.5µm/m·Ksourcemean, 20–100 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing450µm growth82.5µm growth5.45x less
Specific heatnot sourced450J/kg·Ksourceat 20 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)not sourced4.04mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance28.6W/m821W/m28.7x more resistant
Melting pointnot sourced1,390–1,440°Csourcemelting range
Max service temperature90°CsourceHDT 0.45 MPa (ISO 75B), unannealed871–899°Csourceoxidation (scaling) limit in air
Values forLyondellBasell Moplen HP501H polypropylene homopolymer (general purpose), typical ISO valuesATI 316 (UNS S31600), annealed 1.0 mm sheet, ATI technical data sheet (2012); Poisson's ratio from the Nickel Institute/SCI structural stainless design manual

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Plastic Polypropylene stronger than Stainless 316?

Stainless 316 is stronger: its yield strength is 265 MPa against 33 MPa for Plastic Polypropylene (8.03x).

Which is lighter, Plastic Polypropylene or Stainless 316?

Plastic Polypropylene is lighter: 900 kg/m³ against 8,027 kg/m³ for Stainless 316.

Which is stiffer, Plastic Polypropylene or Stainless 316?

Stainless 316 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 1.45 GPa for Plastic Polypropylene, so the same part in Stainless 316 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic Polypropylene or Stainless 316?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic Polypropylene is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Stainless 316 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending).

Part that must bePlastic PolypropyleneStainless 316
Stiff rod or tie (tension)15.5x heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)32% heavierlighter
Stiff panel or platelighter1.73x heavier
Strong rod or tielighter11% heavier
Strong beamlighter2.22x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter3.15x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Plastic Polypropylene or Stainless 316?

Stainless 316 conducts heat better: 14.6 W/m·K against 0.195 W/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.

Which expands less with temperature?

Stainless 316 expands less: 16.5 µm/m·K against 90 µm/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPlastic PolypropyleneStainless 316
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPlastic PolypropyleneStainless 316
Strength against density

Related comparisons