Materials / Compare

Plastic Polypropylene vs. Zinc Zamak 3

Compare Plastic Polypropylene vs. Zinc Zamak 3 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Plastic PolypropyleneBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Zinc Zamak 3Cast
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength33MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527221MPasourcetypical
Ultimate tensile strengthnot sourced283MPasourcetypical
Elongation at breaknot sourced10%sourcetypical, in 2 in.
Young's modulus (stiffness)1.45GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 52785.5GPasourcetypical
Density900kg/m³sourcetypical, 23 °C ISO 1183-16,600kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight36.7kN·m/kg10% higher33.5kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight1.61MN·m/kg13MN·m/kg8.04x higher
Poisson's ratio0.42sourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)0.27sourcetypical, Zamak 3 hot-chamber die cast
Shear modulus0.511GPa33.7GPa65.9x stiffer in shear
Bulk modulus3.02GPa62GPa
Speed of sound1,269m/s3,599m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.17–0.22W/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)113W/m·Ksourcetypical
Thermal expansion80–100µm/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)27.4µm/m·Ksourcetypical
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing450µm growth137µm growth3.28x less
Specific heatnot sourced419J/kg·Ksourcetypical
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)not sourced40.9mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance28.6W/m7,782W/m272x more resistant
Melting pointnot sourced381–387°Csourcemelting range
Max service temperature90°CsourceHDT 0.45 MPa (ISO 75B), unannealednot sourced
Values forLyondellBasell Moplen HP501H polypropylene homopolymer (general purpose), typical ISO valuesZamak 3 (ASTM B86 die cast), Nathan Trotter (zinc alloy producer) technical data sheet, typical values

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Plastic Polypropylene stronger than Zinc Zamak 3?

Zinc Zamak 3 is stronger: its yield strength is 221 MPa against 33 MPa for Plastic Polypropylene (6.7x).

Which is lighter, Plastic Polypropylene or Zinc Zamak 3?

Plastic Polypropylene is lighter: 900 kg/m³ against 6,600 kg/m³ for Zinc Zamak 3.

Which is stiffer, Plastic Polypropylene or Zinc Zamak 3?

Zinc Zamak 3 is stiffer: Young's modulus 85.5 GPa against 1.45 GPa for Plastic Polypropylene, so the same part in Zinc Zamak 3 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic Polypropylene or Zinc Zamak 3?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic Polypropylene is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Zinc Zamak 3 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending).

Part that must bePlastic PolypropyleneZinc Zamak 3
Stiff rod or tie (tension)8.04x heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)5% heavierlighter
Stiff panel or platelighter1.88x heavier
Strong rod or tielighter10% heavier
Strong beamlighter2.06x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter2.83x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Plastic Polypropylene or Zinc Zamak 3?

Zinc Zamak 3 conducts heat better: 113 W/m·K against 0.195 W/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.

Which expands less with temperature?

Zinc Zamak 3 expands less: 27.4 µm/m·K against 90 µm/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPlastic PolypropyleneZinc Zamak 3
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPlastic PolypropyleneZinc Zamak 3
Strength against density

Related comparisons