Materials / Compare

Stainless 17-4PH vs. Plastic UHMWPE

Compare Stainless 17-4PH vs. Plastic UHMWPE strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Stainless 17-4PHWrought
Plastic UHMWPEBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength1,275MPasourcetypical, transverse, sheet/strip20MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527, 50 mm/min
Ultimate tensile strength1,379MPasourcetypical, transverse, sheet/strip43MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at break ISO 527, 50 mm/min
Elongation at break9%sourcetypical, transverse, in 2 in. (50.8 mm)465%sourcetypical, nominal elongation at break ISO 527
Young's modulus (stiffness)197GPasourceH 9000.66GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527, 1 mm/min
Density7,800kg/m³sourceH 900930kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight163kN·m/kg7.6x higher21.5kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight25.3MN·m/kg35.6x higher0.71MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.272sourceH 900 (column)not sourced
Shear modulus77.4GPanot sourced
Bulk modulus144GPanot sourced
Speed of sound5,026m/s842m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity17.9W/m·Ksourceat 149 °C (300 °F), H 9000.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, unfilled (narrative value, generic Celanese UHMWPE)
Thermal expansion10.8µm/m·Ksourcemean, 21–93 °C (70–200 °F), H 900200µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 to 100 °C (generic Celanese UHMWPE)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing54µm growth18.5x less1,000µm growth
Specific heat460J/kg·Ksourcemean, 0–100 °C, H 900not sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)4.99mm²/snot sourced
Thermal shock resistance7,809W/mnot sourced
Melting pointnot sourced130–138°CsourceDSC 10 K/min
Max service temperature316°Csourcestrength-retention limit (not oxidation)80°Csourcerecommended max constant operating temperature
Values forCleveland-Cliffs 17-4 PH, Condition H 900, sheet/strip, transverse (Product Data Bulletin, May 2021)Celanese GUR 4120 (avg. molecular weight 4.7x10^6 g/mol), typical values on compression-molded specimens; CTE and thermal conductivity from Celanese's generic UHMWPE guide (grade not named)

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Stainless 17-4PH stronger than Plastic UHMWPE?

Stainless 17-4PH is stronger: its yield strength is 1,275 MPa against 20 MPa for Plastic UHMWPE (63.8x).

Which is lighter, Stainless 17-4PH or Plastic UHMWPE?

Plastic UHMWPE is lighter: 930 kg/m³ against 7,800 kg/m³ for Stainless 17-4PH.

Which is stiffer, Stainless 17-4PH or Plastic UHMWPE?

Stainless 17-4PH is stiffer: Young's modulus 197 GPa against 0.66 GPa for Plastic UHMWPE, so the same part in Stainless 17-4PH deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Stainless 17-4PH or Plastic UHMWPE?

For the same stiffness or strength: Stainless 17-4PH is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam; Plastic UHMWPE is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beStainless 17-4PHPlastic UHMWPE
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter35.6x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter2.06x heavier
Stiff panel or plate25% heavierlighter
Strong rod or tielighter7.6x heavier
Strong beamlighter1.9x heavier
Strong panel or plate5% heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Stainless 17-4PH or Plastic UHMWPE?

Stainless 17-4PH conducts heat better: 17.9 W/m·K against 0.4 W/m·K for Plastic UHMWPE.

Which expands less with temperature?

Stainless 17-4PH expands less: 10.8 µm/m·K against 200 µm/m·K for Plastic UHMWPE.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Aluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelStainless 17-4PHPlastic UHMWPE
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Aluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickStainless 17-4PHPlastic UHMWPE
Strength against density

Related comparisons