Materials / Compare

Stainless 303 vs. Plastic UHMWPE

Compare Stainless 303 vs. Plastic UHMWPE strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Stainless 303Wrought
Plastic UHMWPEBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength275MPasourceOutokumpu typical (product P = hot rolled plate, transverse)20MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527, 50 mm/min
Ultimate tensile strength585MPasourceOutokumpu typical43MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at break ISO 527, 50 mm/min
Elongation at break35%sourceOutokumpu typical, A5465%sourcetypical, nominal elongation at break ISO 527
Young's modulus (stiffness)200GPasourceat RT (Table 12)0.66GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527, 1 mm/min
Density7,900kg/m³sourceat RT930kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight34.8kN·m/kg1.62x higher21.5kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight25.3MN·m/kg35.7x higher0.71MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.3sourcedesign value (structural stainless steels)not sourced
Shear modulus76.9GPanot sourced
Bulk modulus167GPanot sourced
Speed of sound5,032m/s842m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity15W/m·Ksourceat RT0.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, unfilled (narrative value, generic Celanese UHMWPE)
Thermal expansion16µm/m·Ksourcemean, 20–100 °C200µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 to 100 °C (generic Celanese UHMWPE)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing80µm growth12.5x less1,000µm growth
Specific heat500J/kg·Ksourceat RTnot sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)3.8mm²/snot sourced
Thermal shock resistance902W/mnot sourced
Melting pointnot sourced130–138°CsourceDSC 10 K/min
Max service temperature871°Csourcecontinuous, scaling limit80°Csourcerecommended max constant operating temperature
Values for1.4305 / UNS S30300, Outokumpu typical values (hot rolled, solution annealed) from 'Steel Grades, Properties and Global Standards'; max service from Carpenter CarTech 303 datasheetCelanese GUR 4120 (avg. molecular weight 4.7x10^6 g/mol), typical values on compression-molded specimens; CTE and thermal conductivity from Celanese's generic UHMWPE guide (grade not named)

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Stainless 303 stronger than Plastic UHMWPE?

Stainless 303 is stronger: its yield strength is 275 MPa against 20 MPa for Plastic UHMWPE (13.8x).

Which is lighter, Stainless 303 or Plastic UHMWPE?

Plastic UHMWPE is lighter: 930 kg/m³ against 7,900 kg/m³ for Stainless 303.

Which is stiffer, Stainless 303 or Plastic UHMWPE?

Stainless 303 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 0.66 GPa for Plastic UHMWPE, so the same part in Stainless 303 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Stainless 303 or Plastic UHMWPE?

For the same stiffness or strength: Stainless 303 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie; Plastic UHMWPE is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beStainless 303Plastic UHMWPE
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter35.7x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter2.05x heavier
Stiff panel or plate26% heavierlighter
Strong rod or tielighter1.62x heavier
Strong beam48% heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate2.29x heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Stainless 303 or Plastic UHMWPE?

Stainless 303 conducts heat better: 15 W/m·K against 0.4 W/m·K for Plastic UHMWPE.

Which expands less with temperature?

Stainless 303 expands less: 16 µm/m·K against 200 µm/m·K for Plastic UHMWPE.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelStainless 303Plastic UHMWPE
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickStainless 303Plastic UHMWPE
Strength against density

Related comparisons