Materials / Compare

Titanium Ti-6Al-4V vs. Plastic UHMWPE

Compare Titanium Ti-6Al-4V vs. Plastic UHMWPE strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Titanium Ti-6Al-4VWrought
Plastic UHMWPEBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength885MPasourcetypical, plate (>0.187 in), annealed, 0.2% offset20MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527, 50 mm/min
Ultimate tensile strength940MPasourcetypical, plate, annealed43MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at break ISO 527, 50 mm/min
Elongation at break16%sourcetypical, in 2 in., plate annealed465%sourcetypical, nominal elongation at break ISO 527
Young's modulus (stiffness)107–122GPasourcetypical range, 20 °C0.66GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527, 1 mm/min
Density4,430kg/m³sourcenominal930kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight200kN·m/kg9.29x higher21.5kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight25.8MN·m/kg36.4x higher0.71MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.342sourcemean of TIMET measurementsnot sourced
Shear modulus42.7GPanot sourced
Bulk modulus121GPanot sourced
Speed of sound5,084m/s842m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity6.6W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C, mill annealed0.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, unfilled (narrative value, generic Celanese UHMWPE)
Thermal expansion9µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 0-100 °C200µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 to 100 °C (generic Celanese UHMWPE)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing45µm growth22.2x less1,000µm growth
Specific heat580J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 20 °Cnot sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)2.57mm²/snot sourced
Thermal shock resistance3,730W/mnot sourced
Melting point1,630–1,650°Csourcemelting range130–138°CsourceDSC 10 K/min
Max service temperature400°Csourceupper recommended use temperature80°Csourcerecommended max constant operating temperature
Values forTIMETAL 6-4 (Ti-6Al-4V Grade 5) annealed plate typical (TIMET properties manual) + TIMET datasheet TMC-0150 physical propertiesCelanese GUR 4120 (avg. molecular weight 4.7x10^6 g/mol), typical values on compression-molded specimens; CTE and thermal conductivity from Celanese's generic UHMWPE guide (grade not named)

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Titanium Ti-6Al-4V stronger than Plastic UHMWPE?

Titanium Ti-6Al-4V is stronger: its yield strength is 885 MPa against 20 MPa for Plastic UHMWPE (44.3x).

Which is lighter, Titanium Ti-6Al-4V or Plastic UHMWPE?

Plastic UHMWPE is lighter: 930 kg/m³ against 4,430 kg/m³ for Titanium Ti-6Al-4V.

Which is stiffer, Titanium Ti-6Al-4V or Plastic UHMWPE?

Titanium Ti-6Al-4V is stiffer: Young's modulus 115 GPa against 0.66 GPa for Plastic UHMWPE, so the same part in Titanium Ti-6Al-4V deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Titanium Ti-6Al-4V or Plastic UHMWPE?

For the same stiffness or strength: Titanium Ti-6Al-4V is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beTitanium Ti-6Al-4VPlastic UHMWPE
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter36.4x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter2.77x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter17% heavier
Strong rod or tielighter9.29x heavier
Strong beamlighter2.63x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter40% heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Titanium Ti-6Al-4V or Plastic UHMWPE?

Titanium Ti-6Al-4V conducts heat better: 6.6 W/m·K against 0.4 W/m·K for Plastic UHMWPE.

Which expands less with temperature?

Titanium Ti-6Al-4V expands less: 9 µm/m·K against 200 µm/m·K for Plastic UHMWPE.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Brass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelTitanium Ti-6Al-4VPlastic UHMWPE
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Brass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickTitanium Ti-6Al-4VPlastic UHMWPE
Strength against density

Related comparisons