Materials / Compare
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Plastic UHMWPE
Compare DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Plastic UHMWPE strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 1,100MPasourcetypical, as built, average of horizontal + vertical (M400) | 20MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527, 50 mm/min |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 1,270MPasourcetypical, as built, average of horizontal + vertical (M400) | 43MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at break ISO 527, 50 mm/min |
| Elongation at break | 8.7%sourcetypical at break, as built (M400) | 465%sourcetypical, nominal elongation at break ISO 527 |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 110GPasourcesame maker and process, sibling grade: EOS Titanium Ti64 (Grade 5) on EOS M 290, as built, XY and Z, typical | 0.66GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527, 1 mm/min |
| Density | 4,400kg/m³sourcetypical part density (ISO 3369), M400 | 930kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 250kN·m/kg11.6x higher | 21.5kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 25MN·m/kg35.2x higher | 0.71MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.342sourcewrought TIMETAL 6-4 (TIMET measurement, mean of 10); composition-level, not DMLS-measured | not sourced |
| Shear modulus | 41GPa | not sourced |
| Bulk modulus | 116GPa | not sourced |
| Speed of sound | 5,000m/s | 842m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 6.6W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought Ti-6Al-4V / 6-4 ELI (TIMET datasheet), 20 °C | 0.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, unfilled (narrative value, generic Celanese UHMWPE) |
| Thermal expansion | 9µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228; EOS Ti64 Grade 23 (=ELI) on EOS M 290 40 µm; condition not stated (sheet's mechanical data are heat treated) | 200µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 to 100 °C (generic Celanese UHMWPE) |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 45µm growth22.2x less | 1,000µm growth |
| Specific heat | 580J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought Ti-6Al-4V / 6-4 ELI (TIMET datasheet), 20 °C | not sourced |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 2.59mm²/s | not sourced |
| Thermal shock resistance | 4,825W/m | not sourced |
| Melting point | 1,630–1,650°Csourcemelting range, wrought TIMETAL 6-4 (composition-level) | 130–138°CsourceDSC 10 K/min |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 80°Csourcerecommended max constant operating temperature |
| Values for | EOS Titanium Ti64ELI (powder 9011-0040; ASTM F136/F3001, i.e. Grade 23) on EOS M400 SF, parameter set Ti64ELI_030_FlexM400_100, 30 µm, as built; ISO 6892-1 A14 | Celanese GUR 4120 (avg. molecular weight 4.7x10^6 g/mol), typical values on compression-molded specimens; CTE and thermal conductivity from Celanese's generic UHMWPE guide (grade not named) |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium stronger than Plastic UHMWPE?
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is stronger: its yield strength is 1,100 MPa against 20 MPa for Plastic UHMWPE (55x).
Which is lighter, DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium or Plastic UHMWPE?
Plastic UHMWPE is lighter: 930 kg/m³ against 4,400 kg/m³ for DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium.
Which is stiffer, DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium or Plastic UHMWPE?
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is stiffer: Young's modulus 110 GPa against 0.66 GPa for Plastic UHMWPE, so the same part in DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium or Plastic UHMWPE?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium | Plastic UHMWPE |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 35.2x heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 2.73x heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 16% heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 11.6x heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 3.06x heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 1.57x heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium or Plastic UHMWPE?
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium conducts heat better: 6.6 W/m·K against 0.4 W/m·K for Plastic UHMWPE.
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium expands less: 9 µm/m·K against 200 µm/m·K for Plastic UHMWPE.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Titanium
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Titanium Ti-6Al-4V
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Stainless 17-4PH
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Steel AISI 4340
- Plastic UHMWPE vs. Rubber
- Plastic UHMWPE vs. Plastic HDPE
- Plastic UHMWPE vs. FDM HIPS
- Plastic UHMWPE vs. Plastic Polypropylene