Materials / Compare
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
Compare DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Plastic Polycarbonate strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 270MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | 65MPasourcetypical, tensile yield |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 450MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | 65MPasourcetypical, stress at break |
| Flexural strength | not sourced | 97MPasourcetypical, flexural strength |
| Elongation at break | 10.2%sourcetypical at break, as manufactured, horizontal | 125%sourcetypical, strain at break |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 72GPasourcesame material and process, different machine maker: Renishaw RenAM 500, 30 µm, as built, horizontal (XY) | 2.4GPasourcetypical |
| Density | 2,670kg/m³sourcetypical part density (ISO 3369), EOS M 290, AlSi10Mg_030_FlexM291 (30 µm) | 1,200kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 101kN·m/kg1.87x higher | 54.2kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 27MN·m/kg13.5x higher | 2MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.33sourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (Al-9Si-0.6Mg, closest MIL-HDBK-5J alloy to AlSi10Mg / EN AC-43000) | 0.38sourcetypical, polycarbonate family (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1) |
| Shear modulus | 27.1GPa31.1x stiffer in shear | 0.87GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 70.6GPa | 3.33GPa |
| Speed of sound | 5,193m/s | 1,414m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 110W/m·Ksourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal (ISO 22007-2) | 0.2W/m·Ksourcetypical, through-plane, 23 C |
| Thermal expansion | 20µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228 | 65µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 23-55 C, parallel and normal |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 100µm growth3.25x less | 325µm growth |
| Specific heat | 963J/kg·Ksourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (MIL-HDBK-5J), at 100 °C | 1,172J/kg·Ksourcetypical (guide value), Bayer ASTM datasheet for Makrolon 2405, ASTM D 2766 |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 42.8mm²/s301x faster | 0.142mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 13,819W/m267x more resistant | 51.7W/m |
| Glass transition | not sourced | 144°Csourcetypical, DSC 10 C/min |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 125°CsourceUL 746B RTI, tensile strength, 1.5 mm |
| Values for | EOS Aluminium AlSi10Mg (powder 9011-0024), EOS M 290 | 30 µm process (AlSi10Mg_FlexM291 2.01), as manufactured, horizontal; machined (turned) specimens, ISO 6892-1 B10 | Covestro Makrolon 2405 general-purpose PC (MVR 19), Covestro technical datasheet version 2026-09-28, typical values |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum stronger than Plastic Polycarbonate?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is stronger: its yield strength is 270 MPa against 65 MPa for Plastic Polycarbonate (4.15x).
Which is lighter, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Plastic Polycarbonate?
Plastic Polycarbonate is lighter: 1,200 kg/m³ against 2,670 kg/m³ for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum.
Which is stiffer, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Plastic Polycarbonate?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is stiffer: Young's modulus 72 GPa against 2.4 GPa for Plastic Polycarbonate, so the same part in DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Plastic Polycarbonate?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam; Plastic Polycarbonate is lighter for a strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum | Plastic Polycarbonate |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 13.5x heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 2.46x heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 40% heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 1.87x heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 16% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | 9% heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Plastic Polycarbonate?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum conducts heat better: 110 W/m·K against 0.2 W/m·K for Plastic Polycarbonate.
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum expands less: 20 µm/m·K against 65 µm/m·K for Plastic Polycarbonate.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum 6061-T6
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum 2024-T351
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Concrete
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Nylon
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. SLA Resin Standard
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. FDM Polycarbonate
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Plastic POM/Acetal