Materials / Compare

Aluminum 6063-T6 vs. FDM HIPS

Compare Aluminum 6063-T6 vs. FDM HIPS strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Aluminum 6063-T6Wrought
FDM HIPS3D printed (FDM)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength215MPasourcetypical, T6, 0.0625 in specimennot given (tensile used)
Ultimate tensile strength240MPasourcetypical, T618.4MPasourcetypical
Flexural strengthnot sourced31.8MPasourcetypical
Elongation at break12%sourcetypical, T6, in 4D1.4%sourcetypical
Young's modulus (stiffness)69GPasourcetypical43.5x stiffer1.59GPasourcetypical
Density2,700kg/m³sourcenominal, 20 °C1,023kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight79.6kN·m/kg4.43x higher18kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight25.6MN·m/kg16.5x higher1.55MN·m/kg
Poisson's rationot sourcednot sourced
Shear modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Bulk modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Speed of sound5,055m/s1,246m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity201W/m·Ksourcetypical, T6, 20 °C0.17W/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution PS 486N injection-molding HIPS, typical
Thermal expansion23.4µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C80µm/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution PS 486N injection-molding HIPS, typical
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing117µm growth3.42x less400µm growth
Specific heat901J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C (Hydro EN AW-6063)not sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)82.6mm²/snot sourced
Thermal shock resistancenot sourcednot sourced
Melting point615–655°Csourcemelting rangenot sourced
Glass transitionnot sourced99°Csourcetypical
Max service temperaturenot sourced86°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa
Values for6063-T6 extruded tube, Kaiser Aluminum Tube & Pipe Alloy 6063 Technical Data (Rev. 05/06), typical properties; specific heat from Hydro EN AW-6063 extruded-products datasheet (Rev.4, 03/2023).BASF Forward AM (BASF 3D Printing Solutions) Ultrafuse HiPS, TDS v2.2 (13.11.2019), printed specimens, XY 'Flat'. Specimen print settings are not stated; recommended processing on the sheet: nozzle 240-260 °C, bed 100-120 °C, 40-80 mm/s. Product is discontinued (Forward AM product page) but the TDS is still served by Forward AM.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

FDM HIPS is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Aluminum 6063-T6 stronger than FDM HIPS?

Aluminum 6063-T6 is stronger: its yield strength is 215 MPa against tensile strength 18.4 MPa for FDM HIPS (11.7x).

Which is lighter, Aluminum 6063-T6 or FDM HIPS?

FDM HIPS is lighter: 1,023 kg/m³ against 2,700 kg/m³ for Aluminum 6063-T6.

Which is stiffer, Aluminum 6063-T6 or FDM HIPS?

Aluminum 6063-T6 is stiffer: Young's modulus 69 GPa against 1.59 GPa for FDM HIPS, so the same part in Aluminum 6063-T6 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum 6063-T6 or FDM HIPS?

For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum 6063-T6 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beAluminum 6063-T6FDM HIPS
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter16.5x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter2.5x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter33% heavier
Strong rod or tielighter4.43x heavier
Strong beamlighter1.95x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter30% heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Aluminum 6063-T6 or FDM HIPS?

Aluminum 6063-T6 conducts heat better: 201 W/m·K against 0.17 W/m·K for FDM HIPS.

Which expands less with temperature?

Aluminum 6063-T6 expands less: 23.4 µm/m·K against 80 µm/m·K for FDM HIPS.

Among 72 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Ceramic Aluminum NitrideAluminum A380Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Aluminum 6063-T6FDM HIPS
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Aluminum A380Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Aluminum 6063-T6FDM HIPS
Strength against density

Related comparisons