Materials / Compare
Aluminum 6063-T6 vs. Plastic POM/Acetal
Compare Aluminum 6063-T6 vs. Plastic POM/Acetal strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 215MPasourcetypical, T6, 0.0625 in specimen | 69MPasourcetypical (single ASTM D638 tensile strength) |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 240MPasourcetypical, T6 | 69MPasourcetypical |
| Compressive strength | not sourced | 124MPasourcecompressive stress at 10% deformation |
| Flexural strength | not sourced | 99MPasourceflexural yield strength, typical |
| Elongation at break | 12%sourcetypical, T6, in 4D | 75%sourcetypical |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 69GPasourcetypical24.6x stiffer | 2.8GPasourcetypical |
| Density | 2,700kg/m³sourcenominal, 20 °C | 1,420kg/m³sourcetypical (DuPont product information for Delrin 100 NC010; 'The data listed here fall within the normal range of product properties') |
| Strength to weight | 79.6kN·m/kg1.64x higher | 48.6kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 25.6MN·m/kg13x higher | 1.97MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | not sourced | 0.35sourcetypical |
| Shear modulus | not sourced | 1.04GPa |
| Bulk modulus | not sourced | 3.11GPa |
| Speed of sound | 5,055m/s | 1,404m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 201W/m·Ksourcetypical, T6, 20 °C | 0.4W/m·Ksourcetypical |
| Thermal expansion | 23.4µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C | 122µm/m·Ksourcemean, 29 to 60 °C |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 117µm growth5.21x less | 610µm growth |
| Specific heat | 901J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C (Hydro EN AW-6063) | 1,465J/kg·Ksourceaverage -18 to 100 °C, Delrin acetal resins (not grade-specific) |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 82.6mm²/s430x faster | 0.192mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | not sourced | 52.5W/m |
| Melting point | 615–655°Csourcemelting range | 175°Csourcecrystalline melting point |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 125°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa (annealed) |
| Values for | 6063-T6 extruded tube, Kaiser Aluminum Tube & Pipe Alloy 6063 Technical Data (Rev. 05/06), typical properties; specific heat from Hydro EN AW-6063 extruded-products datasheet (Rev.4, 03/2023). | DuPont Delrin 100 acetal homopolymer, Table 2 'Typical Properties of Delrin Acetal Resins' (ASTM methods), Delrin Design Guide Module III hosted on delrin.com |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is Aluminum 6063-T6 stronger than Plastic POM/Acetal?
Aluminum 6063-T6 is stronger: its yield strength is 215 MPa against 69 MPa for Plastic POM/Acetal (3.12x).
Which is lighter, Aluminum 6063-T6 or Plastic POM/Acetal?
Plastic POM/Acetal is lighter: 1,420 kg/m³ against 2,700 kg/m³ for Aluminum 6063-T6.
Which is stiffer, Aluminum 6063-T6 or Plastic POM/Acetal?
Aluminum 6063-T6 is stiffer: Young's modulus 69 GPa against 2.8 GPa for Plastic POM/Acetal, so the same part in Aluminum 6063-T6 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum 6063-T6 or Plastic POM/Acetal?
For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum 6063-T6 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam; Plastic POM/Acetal is lighter for a strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | Aluminum 6063-T6 | Plastic POM/Acetal |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 13x heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 2.61x heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 1.53x heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 1.64x heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 12% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | 8% heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Aluminum 6063-T6 or Plastic POM/Acetal?
Aluminum 6063-T6 conducts heat better: 201 W/m·K against 0.4 W/m·K for Plastic POM/Acetal.
Which expands less with temperature?
Aluminum 6063-T6 expands less: 23.4 µm/m·K against 122 µm/m·K for Plastic POM/Acetal.
Among 72 materials
Related comparisons
- Aluminum 6063-T6 vs. Aluminum 5052-H32
- Aluminum 6063-T6 vs. DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum
- Aluminum 6063-T6 vs. Aluminum
- Aluminum 6063-T6 vs. Aluminum 6061-T6
- Plastic POM/Acetal vs. SLA Resin Standard
- Plastic POM/Acetal vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
- Plastic POM/Acetal vs. Plastic PMMA
- Plastic POM/Acetal vs. Plastic Nylon