Aluminum A380 vs. Stainless Steel 316

Compare Aluminum A380 vs. Stainless Steel 316 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side

Mechanical
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser	Open in LessCAD	Open in LessCAD
Yield strength	160MPasourcetypical, 25 °C	265MPasourcetypical (representative), annealed 1.0 mm sheet
Ultimate tensile strength	320MPasourcetypical, 25 °C	583MPasourcetypical (representative), annealed 1.0 mm sheet
Elongation at break	3.5%sourcetypical	61%sourcetypical (representative), annealed, in 2 in. (51 mm)
Young's modulus (stiffness)	71GPasourcetypical, 25 °C	200GPasourcetypical, in tension
Density	2,713kg/m³sourcetypical at 68 °F	8,027kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight	59kN·m/kg1.79x higher	33kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight	26.2MN·m/kg5% higher	24.9MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio	not sourced	0.3sourcedesign value (structural stainless steels)
Shear modulus	not sourced	76.9GPa
Bulk modulus	not sourced	167GPa
Speed of sound	5,116m/s	4,992m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity	96.2W/m·Ksourcetypical at 68 °F	14.6W/m·Ksource20–100 °C
Thermal expansion	21.8µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 68-572 °F (20-300 °C)	16.5µm/m·Ksourcemean, 20–100 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing	109µm growth	82.5µm growth32% less
Specific heat	963J/kg·Ksourcetypical at 68 °F	450J/kg·Ksourceat 20 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)	36.8mm²/s9.11x faster	4.04mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance	not sourced	821W/m
Melting point	not sourced	1,390–1,440°Csourcemelting range
Max service temperature	not sourced	871–899°Csourceoxidation (scaling) limit in air
Values for	A380 aluminium high-pressure die-casting alloy, typical properties; Rheocast Company (aluminium die caster, Germantown WI) A380 alloy data page.	ATI 316 (UNS S31600), annealed 1.0 mm sheet, ATI technical data sheet (2012); Poisson's ratio from the Nickel Institute/SCI structural stainless design manual

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Aluminum A380 stronger than Stainless Steel 316?

Stainless Steel 316 is stronger: its yield strength is 265 MPa against 160 MPa for Aluminum A380 (1.66x).

Which is lighter, Aluminum A380 or Stainless Steel 316?

Aluminum A380 is lighter: 2,713 kg/m³ against 8,027 kg/m³ for Stainless Steel 316.

Which is stiffer, Aluminum A380 or Stainless Steel 316?

Stainless Steel 316 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 71 GPa for Aluminum A380, so the same part in Stainless Steel 316 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum A380 or Stainless Steel 316?

For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum A380 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must be	Aluminum A380	Stainless Steel 316
Stiff rod or tie (tension)	lighter	5% heavier
Stiff beam (bending)	lighter	1.76x heavier
Stiff panel or plate	lighter	2.09x heavier
Strong rod or tie	lighter	1.79x heavier
Strong beam	lighter	2.11x heavier
Strong panel or plate	lighter	2.3x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Aluminum A380 or Stainless Steel 316?

Aluminum A380 conducts heat better: 96.2 W/m·K against 14.6 W/m·K for Stainless Steel 316.

Which expands less with temperature?

Stainless Steel 316 expands less: 16.5 µm/m·K against 21.8 µm/m·K for Aluminum A380.

Among 72 materials

Stiffness against density

Strength against density