Materials / Compare

FDM ASA vs. Plastic Nylon

Compare FDM ASA vs. Plastic Nylon strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
FDM ASA3D printed (FDM)
Plastic Nylon3D printed (FDM)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strengthnot given (tensile used)63.1MPasourcetypical
Ultimate tensile strength37MPasourcetypical63.1MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)
Flexural strength65MPasourcetypical82.9MPasourcetypical28% stronger in bending
Elongation at break9.2%sourcetypicalnot sourced
Young's modulus (stiffness)2.45GPasourcetypical2.33GPasourcetypical
Density1,050kg/m³sourcetypical1,140kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight35.2kN·m/kg55.4kN·m/kg1.57x higher
Stiffness to weight2.33MN·m/kg14% higher2.04MN·m/kg
Poisson's rationot sourced0.4sourcebase material: unfilled polyamide (PA), conditioned, maker design-guide family value (Covestro Table 3-1)
Shear modulusnot sourced0.833GPa
Bulk modulusnot sourced3.89GPa
Speed of sound1,528m/s1,430m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.17W/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution Luran S 777K injection-molding ASA, typical0.33W/m·Ksourcebase material: unreinforced BASF Ultramid PA66 (A3K) and PA6 (B3S), 23 C (same value for both)
Thermal expansion80–110µm/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution Luran S 777K injection-molding ASA, range98–102µm/m·Ksourcebase material: unreinforced BASF Ultramid PA66 (A3K, 98) and PA6 (B3S, 102), 23-55 C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing475µm growth5% less500µm growth
Specific heatnot sourced1,700J/kg·Ksourcebase material: unreinforced BASF Ultramid PA66 (A3K) and PA6 (B3S), 23 C (same value for both)
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)not sourced0.17mm²/s
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced53.6W/m
Melting pointnot sourced188°Csourcetypical
Glass transitionnot sourced55.1°Csourcetypical
Max service temperature92°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa89.2°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)
Values forBambu Lab ASA, TDS V3.0, printed specimens X-Y; nozzle 260 °C, bed 80 °C, 200 mm/s, 100% infill; annealed and dried 80 °C for 12 h before testing.Ultimaker Nylon, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat), conditioned >=24 h at room temperature; Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS v2.00, April 20, 2022.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

FDM ASA and Plastic Nylon are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is FDM ASA stronger than Plastic Nylon?

Plastic Nylon is stronger: its yield strength is 63.1 MPa against tensile strength 37 MPa for FDM ASA (1.71x).

Which is lighter, FDM ASA or Plastic Nylon?

FDM ASA is lighter: 1,050 kg/m³ against 1,140 kg/m³ for Plastic Nylon.

Which is stiffer, FDM ASA or Plastic Nylon?

FDM ASA is stiffer: Young's modulus 2.45 GPa against 2.33 GPa for Plastic Nylon, so the same part in FDM ASA deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, FDM ASA or Plastic Nylon?

For the same stiffness or strength: FDM ASA is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate; Plastic Nylon is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beFDM ASAPlastic Nylon
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter14% heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter11% heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter10% heavier
Strong rod or tie1.57x heavierlighter
Strong beam31% heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate20% heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, FDM ASA or Plastic Nylon?

Plastic Nylon conducts heat better: 0.33 W/m·K against 0.17 W/m·K for FDM ASA.

Which expands less with temperature?

FDM ASA expands less: 95 µm/m·K against 100 µm/m·K for Plastic Nylon.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelFDM ASAPlastic Nylon
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPURubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickFDM ASAPlastic Nylon
Strength against density

Related comparisons