Materials / Compare

FDM ASA vs. Plastic PLA

Compare FDM ASA vs. Plastic PLA strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
FDM ASA3D printed (FDM)
Plastic PLA3D printed (FDM)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strengthnot given (tensile used)52.5MPasourcetypical
Ultimate tensile strength37MPasourcetypical52.5MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)
Flexural strength65MPasourcetypical96.8MPasourcetypical49% stronger in bending
Elongation at break9.2%sourcetypical18% more ductile7.8%sourcetypical
Young's modulus (stiffness)2.45GPasourcetypical3.25GPasourcetypical33% stiffer
Density1,050kg/m³sourcetypical18% lighter1,240kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight35.2kN·m/kg42.3kN·m/kg20% higher
Stiffness to weight2.33MN·m/kg2.62MN·m/kg12% higher
Poisson's rationot sourcednot sourced
Shear modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Bulk modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Speed of sound1,528m/s1,619m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.17W/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution Luran S 777K injection-molding ASA, typical0.13W/m·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C
Thermal expansion80–110µm/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution Luran S 777K injection-molding ASA, rangenot sourced
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing475µm growthnot sourced
Specific heatnot sourced1,200J/kg·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)not sourced0.0874mm²/s
Thermal shock resistancenot sourcednot sourced
Melting pointnot sourced152°Csourcetypical
Glass transitionnot sourced59.1°Csourcetypical
Max service temperature92°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa58.8°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)
Values forBambu Lab ASA, TDS V3.0, printed specimens X-Y; nozzle 260 °C, bed 80 °C, 200 mm/s, 100% infill; annealed and dried 80 °C for 12 h before testing.Ultimaker PLA, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat) orientation; Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS dated April 20, 2022.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

FDM ASA and Plastic PLA are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is FDM ASA stronger than Plastic PLA?

Plastic PLA is stronger: its yield strength is 52.5 MPa against tensile strength 37 MPa for FDM ASA (42%).

Which is lighter, FDM ASA or Plastic PLA?

FDM ASA is lighter: 1,050 kg/m³ against 1,240 kg/m³ for Plastic PLA.

Which is stiffer, FDM ASA or Plastic PLA?

Plastic PLA is stiffer: Young's modulus 3.25 GPa against 2.45 GPa for FDM ASA, so the same part in Plastic PLA deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, FDM ASA or Plastic PLA?

For the same stiffness or strength: FDM ASA is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate; Plastic PLA is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), strong rod or tie, strong beam.

Part that must beFDM ASAPlastic PLA
Stiff rod or tie (tension)12% heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)lighter3% heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter7% heavier
Strong rod or tie20% heavierlighter
Strong beam7% heavierlighter
Strong panel or plateabout equalabout equal

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which is more ductile, FDM ASA or Plastic PLA?

FDM ASA stretches further before it breaks: 9.2% elongation at break against 7.8% for Plastic PLA.

Which conducts heat better, FDM ASA or Plastic PLA?

FDM ASA conducts heat better: 0.17 W/m·K against 0.13 W/m·K for Plastic PLA.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelFDM ASAPlastic PLA
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickFDM ASAPlastic PLA
Strength against density

Related comparisons