Materials / Compare

FDM ASA vs. Plastic UHMWPE

Compare FDM ASA vs. Plastic UHMWPE strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
FDM ASA3D printed (FDM)
Plastic UHMWPEBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strengthnot given (tensile used)20MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527, 50 mm/min
Ultimate tensile strength37MPasourcetypical43MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at break ISO 527, 50 mm/min
Flexural strength65MPasourcetypicalnot sourced
Elongation at break9.2%sourcetypical465%sourcetypical, nominal elongation at break ISO 527
Young's modulus (stiffness)2.45GPasourcetypical0.66GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527, 1 mm/min
Density1,050kg/m³sourcetypical930kg/m³sourcetypical13% lighter
Strength to weight35.2kN·m/kg1.64x higher21.5kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight2.33MN·m/kg3.29x higher0.71MN·m/kg
Poisson's rationot sourcednot sourced
Shear modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Bulk modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Speed of sound1,528m/s842m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.17W/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution Luran S 777K injection-molding ASA, typical0.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, unfilled (narrative value, generic Celanese UHMWPE)
Thermal expansion80–110µm/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution Luran S 777K injection-molding ASA, range200µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 to 100 °C (generic Celanese UHMWPE)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing475µm growth2.11x less1,000µm growth
Specific heatnot sourcednot sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)not sourcednot sourced
Thermal shock resistancenot sourcednot sourced
Melting pointnot sourced130–138°CsourceDSC 10 K/min
Max service temperature92°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa80°Csourcerecommended max constant operating temperature
Values forBambu Lab ASA, TDS V3.0, printed specimens X-Y; nozzle 260 °C, bed 80 °C, 200 mm/s, 100% infill; annealed and dried 80 °C for 12 h before testing.Celanese GUR 4120 (avg. molecular weight 4.7x10^6 g/mol), typical values on compression-molded specimens; CTE and thermal conductivity from Celanese's generic UHMWPE guide (grade not named)

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

FDM ASA is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is FDM ASA stronger than Plastic UHMWPE?

FDM ASA is stronger: its tensile strength is 37 MPa against yield strength 20 MPa for Plastic UHMWPE (1.85x).

Which is lighter, FDM ASA or Plastic UHMWPE?

Plastic UHMWPE is lighter: 930 kg/m³ against 1,050 kg/m³ for FDM ASA.

Which is stiffer, FDM ASA or Plastic UHMWPE?

FDM ASA is stiffer: Young's modulus 2.45 GPa against 0.66 GPa for Plastic UHMWPE, so the same part in FDM ASA deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, FDM ASA or Plastic UHMWPE?

For the same stiffness or strength: FDM ASA is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beFDM ASAPlastic UHMWPE
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter3.29x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter1.71x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter37% heavier
Strong rod or tielighter1.64x heavier
Strong beamlighter33% heavier
Strong panel or platelighter20% heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, FDM ASA or Plastic UHMWPE?

Plastic UHMWPE conducts heat better: 0.4 W/m·K against 0.17 W/m·K for FDM ASA.

Which expands less with temperature?

FDM ASA expands less: 95 µm/m·K against 200 µm/m·K for Plastic UHMWPE.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelFDM ASAPlastic UHMWPE
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickFDM ASAPlastic UHMWPE
Strength against density

Related comparisons