Materials / Compare

DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Magnesium AZ31B-H24

Compare DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Magnesium AZ31B-H24 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel3D printed metal (DMLS)
Magnesium AZ31B-H24Wrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength861MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72)220MPasourcetypical, H24, 0.5-6 mm, 0.2 % proof stress
Ultimate tensile strength886MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72)290MPasourcetypical, H24, 0.5-6 mm
Elongation at break19.9%sourcemean at break, as built, horizontal13%sourcetypical, H24, 0.5-6 mm, gauge 5.65√A
Young's modulus (stiffness)197GPasourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900 (Cleveland-Cliffs)44.8GPasourcetypical (handbook physical constant)
Density7,790kg/m³sourcemean part density (ISO 3369)1,769kg/m³sourcenominal
Strength to weight110kN·m/kg124kN·m/kg13% higher
Stiffness to weight25.3MN·m/kg25.3MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.272sourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, all conditions (Cleveland-Cliffs)0.35sourcetypical (handbook physical constant)
Shear modulus77.4GPa4.67x stiffer in shear16.6GPa
Bulk modulus144GPa49.8GPa
Speed of sound5,029m/s5,032m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity17.9W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900, at 149 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs)76.9W/m·Ksourcetypical (temper/temperature not stated)
Thermal expansion10.4µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228, AFTER atmospheric heat treatment (as-built value not published)26.8µm/m·Ksourcetypical (temperature range not stated)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing52µm growth2.58x less134µm growth
Specific heat460J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition A, 0-100 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs)1,040J/kg·Ksourcetypical
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)5mm²/s41.8mm²/s8.37x faster
Thermal shock resistance5,474W/m9,159W/m1.67x more resistant
Max service temperaturenot sourced149°Csourcestated application limit
Values forEOS StainlessSteel 17-4PH IndustryLine (powder 9011-0041), EOS M 290, 40 µm, default job 17-4PH_040_StainlessM291_100, as built, horizontal; ISO 6892 & ASTM E8MAZ31B-H24 sheet 0.016-0.062 in., MIL-HDBK-5J Table 4.2.1.0(b) (AMS 4377); strengths are S-basis MINIMUMS

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel stronger than Magnesium AZ31B-H24?

DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is stronger: its yield strength is 861 MPa against 220 MPa for Magnesium AZ31B-H24 (3.91x).

Which is lighter, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Magnesium AZ31B-H24?

Magnesium AZ31B-H24 is lighter: 1,769 kg/m³ against 7,790 kg/m³ for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel.

Which is stiffer, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Magnesium AZ31B-H24?

DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is stiffer: Young's modulus 197 GPa against 44.8 GPa for Magnesium AZ31B-H24, so the same part in DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Magnesium AZ31B-H24?

For the same stiffness or strength: Magnesium AZ31B-H24 is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelMagnesium AZ31B-H24
Stiff rod or tie (tension)about equalabout equal
Stiff beam (bending)2.1x heavierlighter
Stiff panel or plate2.69x heavierlighter
Strong rod or tie13% heavierlighter
Strong beam1.77x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate2.23x heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Magnesium AZ31B-H24?

Magnesium AZ31B-H24 conducts heat better: 76.9 W/m·K against 17.9 W/m·K for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel.

Which expands less with temperature?

DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel expands less: 10.4 µm/m·K against 26.8 µm/m·K for Magnesium AZ31B-H24.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelMagnesium AZ31B-H24
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelBrickDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelMagnesium AZ31B-H24
Strength against density

Related comparisons