Materials / Compare
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Magnesium AZ91D
Compare DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Magnesium AZ91D strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 861MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72) | 150MPasourcetypical, 0.2% tensile yield, ambient temperature |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 886MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72) | 230MPasourcetypical, ambient temperature |
| Elongation at break | 19.9%sourcemean at break, as built, horizontal | 3%sourcetypical, ambient temperature |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 197GPasourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900 (Cleveland-Cliffs) | 45GPasourcetypical |
| Density | 7,790kg/m³sourcemean part density (ISO 3369) | 1,810kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 110kN·m/kg33% higher | 82.9kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 25.3MN·m/kg2% higher | 24.9MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.272sourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, all conditions (Cleveland-Cliffs) | 0.35sourcebase material: AZ91C casting (MIL-HDBK-5J handbook physical constant) |
| Shear modulus | 77.4GPa4.65x stiffer in shear | 16.7GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 144GPa | 50GPa |
| Speed of sound | 5,029m/s | 4,986m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 17.9W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900, at 149 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs) | 72W/m·Ksourcetypical |
| Thermal expansion | 10.4µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228, AFTER atmospheric heat treatment (as-built value not published) | 25µm/m·Ksourcetypical, temperature range not stated |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 52µm growth2.4x less | 125µm growth |
| Specific heat | 460J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition A, 0-100 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs) | 1,050J/kg·Ksourcetypical |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 5mm²/s | 37.9mm²/s7.58x faster |
| Thermal shock resistance | 5,474W/m | 6,240W/m14% more resistant |
| Melting point | not sourced | 470–595°Csourcemelting range |
| Values for | EOS StainlessSteel 17-4PH IndustryLine (powder 9011-0041), EOS M 290, 40 µm, default job 17-4PH_040_StainlessM291_100, as built, horizontal; ISO 6892 & ASTM E8M | ELEKTRON AZ91D magnesium die-casting alloy, as cast; Magnesium Elektron datasheet 475 (7/01), typical properties; Poisson from MIL-HDBK-5J for AZ91C castings. |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel stronger than Magnesium AZ91D?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is stronger: its yield strength is 861 MPa against 150 MPa for Magnesium AZ91D (5.74x).
Which is lighter, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Magnesium AZ91D?
Magnesium AZ91D is lighter: 1,810 kg/m³ against 7,790 kg/m³ for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel.
Which is stiffer, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Magnesium AZ91D?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is stiffer: Young's modulus 197 GPa against 45 GPa for Magnesium AZ91D, so the same part in DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Magnesium AZ91D?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), strong rod or tie; Magnesium AZ91D is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel | Magnesium AZ91D |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 2% heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 2.06x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 2.63x heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 33% heavier |
| Strong beam | 34% heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 1.8x heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Magnesium AZ91D?
Magnesium AZ91D conducts heat better: 72 W/m·K against 17.9 W/m·K for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel.
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel expands less: 10.4 µm/m·K against 25 µm/m·K for Magnesium AZ91D.
Among 72 materials
Related comparisons
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 4340
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Nickel Inconel 718
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Stainless Steel 17-4PH
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045
- Magnesium AZ91D vs. Magnesium AZ31B-H24
- Magnesium AZ91D vs. Concrete
- Magnesium AZ91D vs. Aluminum A380
- Magnesium AZ91D vs. Aluminum 5052-H32