Materials / Compare
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Plastic POM/Acetal
Compare DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Plastic POM/Acetal strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 861MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72) | 69MPasourcetypical (single ASTM D638 tensile strength) |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 886MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72) | 69MPasourcetypical |
| Compressive strength | not sourced | 124MPasourcecompressive stress at 10% deformation |
| Flexural strength | not sourced | 99MPasourceflexural yield strength, typical |
| Elongation at break | 19.9%sourcemean at break, as built, horizontal | 75%sourcetypical |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 197GPasourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900 (Cleveland-Cliffs) | 2.8GPasourcetypical |
| Density | 7,790kg/m³sourcemean part density (ISO 3369) | 1,420kg/m³sourcetypical (DuPont product information for Delrin 100 NC010; 'The data listed here fall within the normal range of product properties') |
| Strength to weight | 110kN·m/kg2.27x higher | 48.6kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 25.3MN·m/kg12.8x higher | 1.97MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.272sourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, all conditions (Cleveland-Cliffs) | 0.35sourcetypical |
| Shear modulus | 77.4GPa74.7x stiffer in shear | 1.04GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 144GPa | 3.11GPa |
| Speed of sound | 5,029m/s | 1,404m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 17.9W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900, at 149 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs) | 0.4W/m·Ksourcetypical |
| Thermal expansion | 10.4µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228, AFTER atmospheric heat treatment (as-built value not published) | 122µm/m·Ksourcemean, 29 to 60 °C |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 52µm growth11.7x less | 610µm growth |
| Specific heat | 460J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition A, 0-100 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs) | 1,465J/kg·Ksourceaverage -18 to 100 °C, Delrin acetal resins (not grade-specific) |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 5mm²/s26x faster | 0.192mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 5,474W/m104x more resistant | 52.5W/m |
| Melting point | not sourced | 175°Csourcecrystalline melting point |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 125°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa (annealed) |
| Values for | EOS StainlessSteel 17-4PH IndustryLine (powder 9011-0041), EOS M 290, 40 µm, default job 17-4PH_040_StainlessM291_100, as built, horizontal; ISO 6892 & ASTM E8M | DuPont Delrin 100 acetal homopolymer, Table 2 'Typical Properties of Delrin Acetal Resins' (ASTM methods), Delrin Design Guide Module III hosted on delrin.com |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel stronger than Plastic POM/Acetal?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is stronger: its yield strength is 861 MPa against 69 MPa for Plastic POM/Acetal (12.5x).
Which is lighter, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Plastic POM/Acetal?
Plastic POM/Acetal is lighter: 1,420 kg/m³ against 7,790 kg/m³ for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel.
Which is stiffer, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Plastic POM/Acetal?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is stiffer: Young's modulus 197 GPa against 2.8 GPa for Plastic POM/Acetal, so the same part in DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Plastic POM/Acetal?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie; Plastic POM/Acetal is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel | Plastic POM/Acetal |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 12.8x heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 1.53x heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | 33% heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 2.27x heavier |
| Strong beam | 2% heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 1.55x heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Plastic POM/Acetal?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel conducts heat better: 17.9 W/m·K against 0.4 W/m·K for Plastic POM/Acetal.
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel expands less: 10.4 µm/m·K against 122 µm/m·K for Plastic POM/Acetal.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 4340
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Nickel Inconel 718
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Stainless Steel 17-4PH
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045
- Plastic POM/Acetal vs. SLA Resin Standard
- Plastic POM/Acetal vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
- Plastic POM/Acetal vs. Plastic PMMA
- Plastic POM/Acetal vs. Plastic Nylon