Materials / Compare
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Stainless Steel 304
Compare DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Stainless Steel 304 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 861MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72) | 241MPasourcetypical, annealed, 70 °F (21 °C) |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 886MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72) | 586MPasourcetypical, annealed, 70 °F (21 °C) |
| Elongation at break | 19.9%sourcemean at break, as built, horizontal | 55%sourcetypical, annealed, in 2 in. (50.8 mm) |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 197GPasourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900 (Cleveland-Cliffs) | 193GPasourcetypical, in tension |
| Density | 7,790kg/m³sourcemean part density (ISO 3369) | 8,030kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 110kN·m/kg3.68x higher | 30kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 25.3MN·m/kg5% higher | 24MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.272sourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, all conditions (Cleveland-Cliffs) | 0.3sourcedesign value (structural stainless steels) |
| Shear modulus | 77.4GPa4% stiffer in shear | 74.2GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 144GPa | 161GPa |
| Speed of sound | 5,029m/s | 4,903m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 17.9W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900, at 149 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs) | 16.2W/m·Ksourceat 100 °C |
| Thermal expansion | 10.4µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228, AFTER atmospheric heat treatment (as-built value not published) | 16.9µm/m·Ksourcemean, 0–100 °C |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 52µm growth1.63x less | 84.5µm growth |
| Specific heat | 460J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition A, 0-100 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs) | 500J/kg·Ksourcemean, 0–100 °C |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 5mm²/s24% faster | 4.03mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 5,474W/m6.53x more resistant | 838W/m |
| Melting point | not sourced | 1,399–1,454°Csourcemelting range |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 899°Csourcecontinuous, oxidation (scaling) limit in air |
| Values for | EOS StainlessSteel 17-4PH IndustryLine (powder 9011-0041), EOS M 290, 40 µm, default job 17-4PH_040_StainlessM291_100, as built, horizontal; ISO 6892 & ASTM E8M | Type 304, annealed flat-rolled (Cleveland-Cliffs 304/304L Product Data Bulletin, May 2021); Poisson's ratio from the Nickel Institute/SCI structural stainless design manual |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel stronger than Stainless Steel 304?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is stronger: its yield strength is 861 MPa against 241 MPa for Stainless Steel 304 (3.57x).
Which is lighter, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Stainless Steel 304?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is lighter: 7,790 kg/m³ against 8,030 kg/m³ for Stainless Steel 304.
Which is stiffer, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Stainless Steel 304?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is stiffer: Young's modulus 197 GPa against 193 GPa for Stainless Steel 304, so the same part in DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Stainless Steel 304?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel 304 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 5% heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 4% heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 4% heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 3.68x heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 2.41x heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 1.95x heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Stainless Steel 304?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel conducts heat better: 17.9 W/m·K against 16.2 W/m·K for Stainless Steel 304.
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel expands less: 10.4 µm/m·K against 16.9 µm/m·K for Stainless Steel 304.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 4340
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Nickel Inconel 718
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Stainless Steel 17-4PH
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045
- Stainless Steel 304 vs. Stainless Steel 316
- Stainless Steel 304 vs. Stainless Steel 303
- Stainless Steel 304 vs. Iron
- Stainless Steel 304 vs. Steel AISI 1018