Materials / Compare
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Magnesium AZ91D
Compare DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Magnesium AZ91D strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 530MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | 150MPasourcetypical, 0.2% tensile yield, ambient temperature |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 640MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | 230MPasourcetypical, ambient temperature |
| Elongation at break | 40%sourcetypical at break, as manufactured, horizontal | 3%sourcetypical, ambient temperature |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 185GPasourcetypical, as built, horizontal (XY); EOSINT M280-400W / M290-400W, 316L_Surface 1.0, 20 µm (2014 sheet) | 45GPasourcetypical |
| Density | 7,900kg/m³sourcepart density (ISO 3369, not labelled min or typical), EOS M 290, 40 µm FlexLine | 1,810kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 67.1kN·m/kg | 82.9kN·m/kg24% higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 23.4MN·m/kg | 24.9MN·m/kg6% higher |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.3sourcebase material: austenitic stainless steels incl. 1.4404 (316L), design value | 0.35sourcebase material: AZ91C casting (MIL-HDBK-5J handbook physical constant) |
| Shear modulus | 71.2GPa4.27x stiffer in shear | 16.7GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 154GPa | 50GPa |
| Speed of sound | 4,839m/s | 4,986m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 16.2W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), at 100 °C | 72W/m·Ksourcetypical |
| Thermal expansion | 15.7µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228 | 25µm/m·Ksourcetypical, temperature range not stated |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 78.6µm growth1.59x less | 125µm growth |
| Specific heat | 500J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), 0-100 °C | 1,050J/kg·Ksourcetypical |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 4.1mm²/s | 37.9mm²/s9.24x faster |
| Thermal shock resistance | 2,067W/m | 6,240W/m3.02x more resistant |
| Melting point | not sourced | 470–595°Csourcemelting range |
| Values for | EOS StainlessSteel 316L (powder 9011-0032), EOS M 290, ParameterSet 316L 20µm Surface M290/400W, as manufactured, horizontal; ISO 6892-1 | ELEKTRON AZ91D magnesium die-casting alloy, as cast; Magnesium Elektron datasheet 475 (7/01), typical properties; Poisson from MIL-HDBK-5J for AZ91C castings. |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is DMLS 316L Stainless Steel stronger than Magnesium AZ91D?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is stronger: its yield strength is 530 MPa against 150 MPa for Magnesium AZ91D (3.53x).
Which is lighter, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Magnesium AZ91D?
Magnesium AZ91D is lighter: 1,810 kg/m³ against 7,900 kg/m³ for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.
Which is stiffer, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Magnesium AZ91D?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is stiffer: Young's modulus 185 GPa against 45 GPa for Magnesium AZ91D, so the same part in DMLS 316L Stainless Steel deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Magnesium AZ91D?
For the same stiffness or strength: Magnesium AZ91D is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS 316L Stainless Steel | Magnesium AZ91D |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 6% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 2.15x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 2.72x heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | 24% heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 1.88x heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 2.32x heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Magnesium AZ91D?
Magnesium AZ91D conducts heat better: 72 W/m·K against 16.2 W/m·K for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel expands less: 15.7 µm/m·K against 25 µm/m·K for Magnesium AZ91D.
Among 72 materials
Related comparisons
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel A992
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1018
- Magnesium AZ91D vs. Magnesium AZ31B-H24
- Magnesium AZ91D vs. Concrete
- Magnesium AZ91D vs. Aluminum A380
- Magnesium AZ91D vs. Aluminum 5052-H32