Materials / Compare

DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Plastic Nylon PA6

Compare DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Plastic Nylon PA6 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel3D printed metal (DMLS)
Plastic Nylon PA6Bulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength530MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal90MPasourcetypical, dry
Ultimate tensile strength640MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontalnot sourced
Elongation at break40%sourcetypical at break, as manufactured, horizontal10%sourcenominal strain at break, dry
Young's modulus (stiffness)185GPasourcetypical, as built, horizontal (XY); EOSINT M280-400W / M290-400W, 316L_Surface 1.0, 20 µm (2014 sheet)3.5GPasourcetypical, dry
Density7,900kg/m³sourcepart density (ISO 3369, not labelled min or typical), EOS M 290, 40 µm FlexLine1,130kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight67.1kN·m/kg79.6kN·m/kg19% higher
Stiffness to weight23.4MN·m/kg7.56x higher3.1MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.3sourcebase material: austenitic stainless steels incl. 1.4404 (316L), design value0.4sourcebase material: unfilled polyamide (PA), conditioned, maker design-guide family value (Covestro Table 3-1)
Shear modulus71.2GPa56.9x stiffer in shear1.25GPa
Bulk modulus154GPa5.83GPa
Speed of sound4,839m/s1,760m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity16.2W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), at 100 °C0.33W/m·Ksourcetypical
Thermal expansion15.7µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228102µm/m·Ksourcelongitudinal, 23-55 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing78.6µm growth6.49x less510µm growth
Specific heat500J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), 0-100 °C1,700J/kg·Ksourcetypical
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)4.1mm²/s23.9x faster0.172mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance2,067W/m41.4x more resistant49.9W/m
Melting pointnot sourced220°CsourceDSC
Max service temperaturenot sourced87°CsourceIEC 60216 temperature index, 20000 h
Values forEOS StainlessSteel 316L (powder 9011-0032), EOS M 290, ParameterSet 316L 20µm Surface M290/400W, as manufactured, horizontal; ISO 6892-1BASF Ultramid B3S (PA6, unreinforced injection-moulding grade), Product Information 02/2026, dry values (ISO methods)

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is DMLS 316L Stainless Steel stronger than Plastic Nylon PA6?

DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is stronger: its yield strength is 530 MPa against 90 MPa for Plastic Nylon PA6 (5.89x).

Which is lighter, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Plastic Nylon PA6?

Plastic Nylon PA6 is lighter: 1,130 kg/m³ against 7,900 kg/m³ for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.

Which is stiffer, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Plastic Nylon PA6?

DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is stiffer: Young's modulus 185 GPa against 3.5 GPa for Plastic Nylon PA6, so the same part in DMLS 316L Stainless Steel deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Plastic Nylon PA6?

For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending); Plastic Nylon PA6 is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beDMLS 316L Stainless SteelPlastic Nylon PA6
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter7.56x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter4% heavier
Stiff panel or plate1.86x heavierlighter
Strong rod or tie19% heavierlighter
Strong beam2.14x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate2.88x heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Plastic Nylon PA6?

DMLS 316L Stainless Steel conducts heat better: 16.2 W/m·K against 0.33 W/m·K for Plastic Nylon PA6.

Which expands less with temperature?

DMLS 316L Stainless Steel expands less: 15.7 µm/m·K against 102 µm/m·K for Plastic Nylon PA6.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelDMLS 316L Stainless SteelPlastic Nylon PA6
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickDMLS 316L Stainless SteelPlastic Nylon PA6
Strength against density

Related comparisons