Materials / Compare
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. SLA Resin Elastic 50A
Compare DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. SLA Resin Elastic 50A strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 530MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | not given (tensile used) |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 640MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | 3.4MPasourcetypical |
| Elongation at break | 40%sourcetypical at break, as manufactured, horizontal | 160%sourcetypical |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 185GPasourcetypical, as built, horizontal (XY); EOSINT M280-400W / M290-400W, 316L_Surface 1.0, 20 µm (2014 sheet) | not sourced |
| Density | 7,900kg/m³sourcepart density (ISO 3369, not labelled min or typical), EOS M 290, 40 µm FlexLine | 1,010kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 67.1kN·m/kg19.9x higher | 3.37kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 23.4MN·m/kg | not sourced |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.3sourcebase material: austenitic stainless steels incl. 1.4404 (316L), design value | not sourced |
| Shear modulus | 71.2GPa | not sourced |
| Bulk modulus | 154GPa | not sourced |
| Speed of sound | 4,839m/s | not sourced |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 16.2W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), at 100 °C | not sourced |
| Thermal expansion | 15.7µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228 | not sourced |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 78.6µm growth | not sourced |
| Specific heat | 500J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), 0-100 °C | not sourced |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 4.1mm²/s | not sourced |
| Thermal shock resistance | 2,067W/m | not sourced |
| Glass transition | not sourced | -34.5°CsourceDMA |
| Values for | EOS StainlessSteel 316L (powder 9011-0032), EOS M 290, ParameterSet 316L 20µm Surface M290/400W, as manufactured, horizontal; ISO 6892-1 | Formlabs Elastic 50A Resin V2 (FLELCL02), TDS Rev. 01 24.01.2024; parts printed on Form 3, 100 µm, Elastic 50A V2 settings and post-processing; tensile on Die C specimens cut from printed sheets after 3+ h at 23 °C. |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel and SLA Resin Elastic 50A are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is DMLS 316L Stainless Steel stronger than SLA Resin Elastic 50A?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is stronger: its yield strength is 530 MPa against tensile strength 3.4 MPa for SLA Resin Elastic 50A (156x).
Which is lighter, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or SLA Resin Elastic 50A?
SLA Resin Elastic 50A is lighter: 1,010 kg/m³ against 7,900 kg/m³ for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or SLA Resin Elastic 50A?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS 316L Stainless Steel | SLA Resin Elastic 50A |
|---|---|---|
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 19.9x heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 3.7x heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 1.6x heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel A992
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1018
- SLA Resin Elastic 50A vs. Brick
- SLA Resin Elastic 50A vs. Drywall
- SLA Resin Elastic 50A vs. Concrete
- SLA Resin Elastic 50A vs. Plastic PTFE