Materials / Compare
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. SLA Resin Standard
Compare DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. SLA Resin Standard strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 530MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | not given (tensile used) |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 640MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | 60MPasourcetypical |
| Flexural strength | not sourced | 105MPasourcetypical |
| Elongation at break | 40%sourcetypical at break, as manufactured, horizontal | 8%sourcetypical |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 185GPasourcetypical, as built, horizontal (XY); EOSINT M280-400W / M290-400W, 316L_Surface 1.0, 20 µm (2014 sheet) | 2.75GPasourcetypical |
| Density | 7,900kg/m³sourcepart density (ISO 3369, not labelled min or typical), EOS M 290, 40 µm FlexLine | not sourced |
| Strength to weight | 67.1kN·m/kg | not sourced |
| Stiffness to weight | 23.4MN·m/kg | not sourced |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.3sourcebase material: austenitic stainless steels incl. 1.4404 (316L), design value | not sourced |
| Shear modulus | 71.2GPa | not sourced |
| Bulk modulus | 154GPa | not sourced |
| Speed of sound | 4,839m/s | not sourced |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 16.2W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), at 100 °C | not sourced |
| Thermal expansion | 15.7µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228 | not sourced |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 78.6µm growth | not sourced |
| Specific heat | 500J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), 0-100 °C | not sourced |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 4.1mm²/s | not sourced |
| Thermal shock resistance | 2,067W/m | not sourced |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 59°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa |
| Values for | EOS StainlessSteel 316L (powder 9011-0032), EOS M 290, ParameterSet 316L 20µm Surface M290/400W, as manufactured, horizontal; ISO 6892-1 | Formlabs Clear Resin V5 (FLGPCL05), TDS Rev. 01 March 20, 2024; printed on Form 4 at 100 µm, washed 5 min in >=99% IPA, post-cured 15 min at 60 °C in Form Cure. Orientation not stated. |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel and SLA Resin Standard are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is DMLS 316L Stainless Steel stronger than SLA Resin Standard?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is stronger: its yield strength is 530 MPa against tensile strength 60 MPa for SLA Resin Standard (8.83x).
Which is stiffer, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or SLA Resin Standard?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is stiffer: Young's modulus 185 GPa against 2.75 GPa for SLA Resin Standard, so the same part in DMLS 316L Stainless Steel deflects less under the same load.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel A992
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1018
- SLA Resin Standard vs. Plastic POM/Acetal
- SLA Resin Standard vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
- SLA Resin Standard vs. Plastic Nylon
- SLA Resin Standard vs. FDM Polycarbonate