Materials / Compare
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Solder SAC305
Compare DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Solder SAC305 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 1,100MPasourcetypical, as built, average of horizontal + vertical (M400) | 22MPasourcetypical |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 1,270MPasourcetypical, as built, average of horizontal + vertical (M400) | 39.6MPasourcetypical |
| Elongation at break | 8.7%sourcetypical at break, as built (M400) | 49%sourcetypical |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 110GPasourcesame maker and process, sibling grade: EOS Titanium Ti64 (Grade 5) on EOS M 290, as built, XY and Z, typical | 6.9GPasourcetypical, temperature and strain rate not stated |
| Density | 4,400kg/m³sourcetypical part density (ISO 3369), M400 | 7,350kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 250kN·m/kg83.5x higher | 2.99kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 25MN·m/kg26.6x higher | 0.939MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.342sourcewrought TIMETAL 6-4 (TIMET measurement, mean of 10); composition-level, not DMLS-measured | 0.35sourcetypical |
| Shear modulus | 41GPa16x stiffer in shear | 2.56GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 116GPa | 7.67GPa |
| Speed of sound | 5,000m/s | 969m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 6.6W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought Ti-6Al-4V / 6-4 ELI (TIMET datasheet), 20 °C | 61W/m·Ksourcetypical, temperature not stated |
| Thermal expansion | 9µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228; EOS Ti64 Grade 23 (=ELI) on EOS M 290 40 µm; condition not stated (sheet's mechanical data are heat treated) | 21.9µm/m·Ksourcemean, 20-100 °C (MacDermid Alpha) |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 45µm growth2.43x less | 110µm growth |
| Specific heat | 580J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought Ti-6Al-4V / 6-4 ELI (TIMET datasheet), 20 °C | 232J/kg·Ksourcetypical (MacDermid Alpha) |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 2.59mm²/s | 35.8mm²/s13.8x faster |
| Thermal shock resistance | 4,825W/m | 5,773W/m20% more resistant |
| Melting point | 1,630–1,650°Csourcemelting range, wrought TIMETAL 6-4 (composition-level) | 217–220°Csourcesolidus-liquidus |
| Values for | EOS Titanium Ti64ELI (powder 9011-0040; ASTM F136/F3001, i.e. Grade 23) on EOS M400 SF, parameter set Ti64ELI_030_FlexM400_100, 30 µm, as built; ISO 6892-1 A14 | SAC305 (Sn96.5Ag3.0Cu0.5) solder alloy, bulk; Indium Corporation Indalloy 256 (SAC305) for Preforms product data sheet (Form No. 100346 R0, 2024), selected properties, test temperature not stated; expansion and specific heat from MacDermid Alpha VACULOY SAC TDS (06 September 2023). |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium stronger than Solder SAC305?
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is stronger: its yield strength is 1,100 MPa against 22 MPa for Solder SAC305 (50x).
Which is lighter, DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium or Solder SAC305?
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is lighter: 4,400 kg/m³ against 7,350 kg/m³ for Solder SAC305.
Which is stiffer, DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium or Solder SAC305?
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is stiffer: Young's modulus 110 GPa against 6.9 GPa for Solder SAC305, so the same part in DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium or Solder SAC305?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium | Solder SAC305 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 26.6x heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 6.67x heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 4.2x heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 83.5x heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 22.7x heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 11.8x heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium or Solder SAC305?
Solder SAC305 conducts heat better: 61 W/m·K against 6.6 W/m·K for DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium.
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium expands less: 9 µm/m·K against 21.9 µm/m·K for Solder SAC305.
Among 72 materials
Related comparisons
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Titanium
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Titanium Ti-6Al-4V
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Stainless Steel 17-4PH
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Steel AISI 4340
- Solder SAC305 vs. Plywood
- Solder SAC305 vs. SLA Resin Standard
- Solder SAC305 vs. Plastic PTFE
- Solder SAC305 vs. Wood