Materials / Compare

FDM HIPS vs. Magnesium AZ91D

Compare FDM HIPS vs. Magnesium AZ91D strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
FDM HIPS3D printed (FDM)
Magnesium AZ91DCast
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strengthnot given (tensile used)150MPasourcetypical, 0.2% tensile yield, ambient temperature
Ultimate tensile strength18.4MPasourcetypical230MPasourcetypical, ambient temperature
Flexural strength31.8MPasourcetypicalnot sourced
Elongation at break1.4%sourcetypical3%sourcetypical, ambient temperature
Young's modulus (stiffness)1.59GPasourcetypical45GPasourcetypical28.3x stiffer
Density1,023kg/m³sourcetypical1.77x lighter1,810kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight18kN·m/kg82.9kN·m/kg4.61x higher
Stiffness to weight1.55MN·m/kg24.9MN·m/kg16x higher
Poisson's rationot sourced0.35sourcebase material: AZ91C casting (MIL-HDBK-5J handbook physical constant)
Shear modulusnot sourced16.7GPa
Bulk modulusnot sourced50GPa
Speed of sound1,246m/s4,986m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.17W/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution PS 486N injection-molding HIPS, typical72W/m·Ksourcetypical
Thermal expansion80µm/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution PS 486N injection-molding HIPS, typical25µm/m·Ksourcetypical, temperature range not stated
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing400µm growth125µm growth3.2x less
Specific heatnot sourced1,050J/kg·Ksourcetypical
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)not sourced37.9mm²/s
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced6,240W/m
Melting pointnot sourced470–595°Csourcemelting range
Glass transition99°Csourcetypicalnot sourced
Max service temperature86°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPanot sourced
Values forBASF Forward AM (BASF 3D Printing Solutions) Ultrafuse HiPS, TDS v2.2 (13.11.2019), printed specimens, XY 'Flat'. Specimen print settings are not stated; recommended processing on the sheet: nozzle 240-260 °C, bed 100-120 °C, 40-80 mm/s. Product is discontinued (Forward AM product page) but the TDS is still served by Forward AM.ELEKTRON AZ91D magnesium die-casting alloy, as cast; Magnesium Elektron datasheet 475 (7/01), typical properties; Poisson from MIL-HDBK-5J for AZ91C castings.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

FDM HIPS is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is FDM HIPS stronger than Magnesium AZ91D?

Magnesium AZ91D is stronger: its yield strength is 150 MPa against tensile strength 18.4 MPa for FDM HIPS (8.15x).

Which is lighter, FDM HIPS or Magnesium AZ91D?

FDM HIPS is lighter: 1,023 kg/m³ against 1,810 kg/m³ for Magnesium AZ91D.

Which is stiffer, FDM HIPS or Magnesium AZ91D?

Magnesium AZ91D is stiffer: Young's modulus 45 GPa against 1.59 GPa for FDM HIPS, so the same part in Magnesium AZ91D deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, FDM HIPS or Magnesium AZ91D?

For the same stiffness or strength: Magnesium AZ91D is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beFDM HIPSMagnesium AZ91D
Stiff rod or tie (tension)16x heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)3.01x heavierlighter
Stiff panel or plate1.72x heavierlighter
Strong rod or tie4.61x heavierlighter
Strong beam2.29x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate1.61x heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, FDM HIPS or Magnesium AZ91D?

Magnesium AZ91D conducts heat better: 72 W/m·K against 0.17 W/m·K for FDM HIPS.

Which expands less with temperature?

Magnesium AZ91D expands less: 25 µm/m·K against 80 µm/m·K for FDM HIPS.

Among 72 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Ceramic Aluminum NitrideAluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Solder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30FDM HIPSMagnesium AZ91D
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Aluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Solder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30FDM HIPSMagnesium AZ91D
Strength against density

Related comparisons