Materials / Compare

FDM PAHT-CF vs. Solder SAC305

Compare FDM PAHT-CF vs. Solder SAC305 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
FDM PAHT-CF3D printed (FDM)
Solder SAC305Cast
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strengthnot given (tensile used)22MPasourcetypical
Ultimate tensile strength92MPasourcetypical2.32x stronger39.6MPasourcetypical
Flexural strength125MPasourcetypicalnot sourced
Elongation at break8.4%sourcetypical49%sourcetypical5.83x more ductile
Young's modulus (stiffness)3.86GPasourcetypical6.9GPasourcetypical, temperature and strain rate not stated
Density1,060kg/m³sourcetypical6.93x lighter7,350kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight86.8kN·m/kg29x higher2.99kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight3.64MN·m/kg3.88x higher0.939MN·m/kg
Poisson's rationot sourced0.35sourcetypical
Shear modulusnot sourced2.56GPa
Bulk modulusnot sourced7.67GPa
Speed of sound1,908m/s969m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivitynot sourced61W/m·Ksourcetypical, temperature not stated
Thermal expansionnot sourced21.9µm/m·Ksourcemean, 20-100 °C (MacDermid Alpha)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swingnot sourced110µm growth
Specific heatnot sourced232J/kg·Ksourcetypical (MacDermid Alpha)
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)not sourced35.8mm²/s
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced5,773W/m
Melting point225°Csourcetypical217–220°Csourcesolidus-liquidus
Glass transition70°Csourcetypicalnot sourced
Max service temperature170°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPanot sourced
Values forBambu Lab PAHT-CF, TDS V3.0, printed specimens X-Y, dry state; nozzle 290 °C, bed 100 °C, 100 mm/s, 100% infill; annealed and dried 80 °C for 12 h before testing.SAC305 (Sn96.5Ag3.0Cu0.5) solder alloy, bulk; Indium Corporation Indalloy 256 (SAC305) for Preforms product data sheet (Form No. 100346 R0, 2024), selected properties, test temperature not stated; expansion and specific heat from MacDermid Alpha VACULOY SAC TDS (06 September 2023).

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

FDM PAHT-CF is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is FDM PAHT-CF stronger than Solder SAC305?

FDM PAHT-CF is stronger: its tensile strength is 92 MPa against yield strength 22 MPa for Solder SAC305 (4.18x).

Which is lighter, FDM PAHT-CF or Solder SAC305?

FDM PAHT-CF is lighter: 1,060 kg/m³ against 7,350 kg/m³ for Solder SAC305.

Which is stiffer, FDM PAHT-CF or Solder SAC305?

Solder SAC305 is stiffer: Young's modulus 6.9 GPa against 3.86 GPa for FDM PAHT-CF, so the same part in Solder SAC305 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, FDM PAHT-CF or Solder SAC305?

For the same stiffness or strength: FDM PAHT-CF is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beFDM PAHT-CFSolder SAC305
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter3.88x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter5.19x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter5.71x heavier
Strong rod or tielighter29x heavier
Strong beamlighter18x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter14.2x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which is more ductile, FDM PAHT-CF or Solder SAC305?

Solder SAC305 stretches further before it breaks: 49% elongation at break against 8.4% for FDM PAHT-CF.

Among 72 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Ceramic Aluminum NitrideAluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DPlastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30FDM PAHT-CFSolder SAC305
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Aluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DPlastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30FDM PAHT-CFSolder SAC305
Strength against density

Related comparisons