Materials / Compare

FDM HIPS vs. Steel

Compare FDM HIPS vs. Steel strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
FDM HIPS3D printed (FDM)
SteelWrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strengthnot given (tensile used)385MPasourcetypical: mean of 20,295 A992 flange mill-test coupons (1998 SSPC survey), as reported by AISC
Ultimate tensile strength18.4MPasourcetypical505MPasourcetypical: mean of 20,295 A992 flange mill-test coupons (1998 SSPC survey)
Flexural strength31.8MPasourcetypicalnot sourced
Elongation at break1.4%sourcetypicalnot sourced
Young's modulus (stiffness)1.59GPasourcetypical200GPasourcedesign value (AISC 360-16)
Density1,023kg/m³sourcetypical7,850kg/m³sourcenominal (constructional data)
Strength to weight18kN·m/kg49kN·m/kg2.73x higher
Stiffness to weight1.55MN·m/kg25.5MN·m/kg16.4x higher
Poisson's rationot sourced0.3sourcedesign value (AISC 360-16 Commentary)
Shear modulusnot sourced76.9GPa
Bulk modulusnot sourced167GPa
Speed of sound1,246m/s5,048m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.17W/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution PS 486N injection-molding HIPS, typical48W/m·Ksourcenominal at 20 °C
Thermal expansion80µm/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution PS 486N injection-molding HIPS, typical12µm/m·Ksourcenominal (constructional data, no temperature range stated)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing400µm growth60µm growth6.67x less
Specific heatnot sourced460–480J/kg·Ksourcebase material: EN S275JR unalloyed structural steel (the EN counterpart of A36), typical, 50/100 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)not sourced13mm²/s
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced5,390W/m
Glass transition99°Csourcetypicalnot sourced
Max service temperature86°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPanot sourced
Values forBASF Forward AM (BASF 3D Printing Solutions) Ultrafuse HiPS, TDS v2.2 (13.11.2019), printed specimens, XY 'Flat'. Specimen print settings are not stated; recommended processing on the sheet: nozzle 240-260 °C, bed 100-120 °C, 40-80 mm/s. Product is discontinued (Forward AM product page) but the TDS is still served by Forward AM.Generic structural steel, cited as ASTM A992 (the current US structural grade): ASTM A992 W-shapes; Fy/Fu specified minimums from AISC publications (AISC 360-16 Commentary; Modern Steel Construction); elastic constants AISC 360; physical constants from the bauforumstahl structural-steel EPD, which names A992 among covered product standards.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

FDM HIPS is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is FDM HIPS stronger than Steel?

Steel is stronger: its yield strength is 385 MPa against tensile strength 18.4 MPa for FDM HIPS (20.9x).

Which is lighter, FDM HIPS or Steel?

FDM HIPS is lighter: 1,023 kg/m³ against 7,850 kg/m³ for Steel.

Which is stiffer, FDM HIPS or Steel?

Steel is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 1.59 GPa for FDM HIPS, so the same part in Steel deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, FDM HIPS or Steel?

For the same stiffness or strength: FDM HIPS is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Steel is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie.

Part that must beFDM HIPSSteel
Stiff rod or tie (tension)16.4x heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)46% heavierlighter
Stiff panel or platelighter1.53x heavier
Strong rod or tie2.73x heavierlighter
Strong beamlighter1% heavier
Strong panel or platelighter1.68x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, FDM HIPS or Steel?

Steel conducts heat better: 48 W/m·K against 0.17 W/m·K for FDM HIPS.

Which expands less with temperature?

Steel expands less: 12 µm/m·K against 80 µm/m·K for FDM HIPS.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelFDM HIPSSteel
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickFDM HIPSSteel
Strength against density

Related comparisons