Materials / Compare

Nickel Inconel 718 vs. FDM Polycarbonate

Compare Nickel Inconel 718 vs. FDM Polycarbonate strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Nickel Inconel 718Wrought
FDM Polycarbonate3D printed (FDM)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength1,207MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. hot-rolled bar, 0.2% offset53.3MPasourcetypical
Ultimate tensile strength1,389MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar53.3MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)
Flexural strengthnot sourced89.4MPasourcetypical
Elongation at break20%sourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar9.2%sourcetypical
Young's modulus (stiffness)200GPasourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged2.39GPasourcetypical
Density8,221kg/m³sourcenominal, annealed and aged1,180–1,200kg/m³sourcerange
Strength to weight147kN·m/kg3.28x higher44.8kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight24.3MN·m/kg12.1x higher2.01MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.294sourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged0.38sourcebase material: polycarbonate family typical (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1)
Shear modulus77.3GPa89.1x stiffer in shear0.867GPa
Bulk modulus162GPa3.33GPa
Speed of sound4,932m/s1,418m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity11.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged (calculated from resistivity per footnote a)0.2W/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, through-plane, 23 °C
Thermal expansion13.2µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 21-93 °C, annealed + aged65µm/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, 23-55 °C, parallel
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing66µm growth4.92x less325µm growth
Specific heat435J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 21 °Cnot sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)3.19mm²/snot sourced
Thermal shock resistance3,680W/m86.6x more resistant42.5W/m
Melting point1,260–1,336°Csourcemelting rangenot sourced
Glass transitionnot sourced108°Csourcetypical
Max service temperature704°Csourceupper use temperature stated by producer105°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)
Values forINCONEL alloy 718, standard grade, 1750 °F/1 hr anneal + 1325 °F/8 hr F.C. to 1150 °F aged; Special Metals bulletin SMC-045 typical valuesUltimaker PC, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS (file v5.00), April 20, 2022.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

FDM Polycarbonate is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Nickel Inconel 718 stronger than FDM Polycarbonate?

Nickel Inconel 718 is stronger: its yield strength is 1,207 MPa against 53.3 MPa for FDM Polycarbonate (22.6x).

Which is lighter, Nickel Inconel 718 or FDM Polycarbonate?

FDM Polycarbonate is lighter: 1,190 kg/m³ against 8,221 kg/m³ for Nickel Inconel 718.

Which is stiffer, Nickel Inconel 718 or FDM Polycarbonate?

Nickel Inconel 718 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 2.39 GPa for FDM Polycarbonate, so the same part in Nickel Inconel 718 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Nickel Inconel 718 or FDM Polycarbonate?

For the same stiffness or strength: Nickel Inconel 718 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam; FDM Polycarbonate is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beNickel Inconel 718FDM Polycarbonate
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter12.1x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter32% heavier
Stiff panel or plate1.58x heavierlighter
Strong rod or tielighter3.28x heavier
Strong beamlighter16% heavier
Strong panel or plate45% heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Nickel Inconel 718 or FDM Polycarbonate?

Nickel Inconel 718 conducts heat better: 11.4 W/m·K against 0.2 W/m·K for FDM Polycarbonate.

Which expands less with temperature?

Nickel Inconel 718 expands less: 13.2 µm/m·K against 65 µm/m·K for FDM Polycarbonate.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelNickel Inconel 718FDM Polycarbonate
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickNickel Inconel 718FDM Polycarbonate
Strength against density

Related comparisons