Materials / Compare
Nickel Inconel 718 vs. FDM Polycarbonate
Compare Nickel Inconel 718 vs. FDM Polycarbonate strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 1,207MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. hot-rolled bar, 0.2% offset | 53.3MPasourcetypical |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 1,389MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar | 53.3MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield) |
| Flexural strength | not sourced | 89.4MPasourcetypical |
| Elongation at break | 20%sourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar | 9.2%sourcetypical |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 200GPasourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged | 2.39GPasourcetypical |
| Density | 8,221kg/m³sourcenominal, annealed and aged | 1,180–1,200kg/m³sourcerange |
| Strength to weight | 147kN·m/kg3.28x higher | 44.8kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 24.3MN·m/kg12.1x higher | 2.01MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.294sourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged | 0.38sourcebase material: polycarbonate family typical (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1) |
| Shear modulus | 77.3GPa89.1x stiffer in shear | 0.867GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 162GPa | 3.33GPa |
| Speed of sound | 4,932m/s | 1,418m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 11.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged (calculated from resistivity per footnote a) | 0.2W/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, through-plane, 23 °C |
| Thermal expansion | 13.2µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 21-93 °C, annealed + aged | 65µm/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, 23-55 °C, parallel |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 66µm growth4.92x less | 325µm growth |
| Specific heat | 435J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C | not sourced |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 3.19mm²/s | not sourced |
| Thermal shock resistance | 3,680W/m86.6x more resistant | 42.5W/m |
| Melting point | 1,260–1,336°Csourcemelting range | not sourced |
| Glass transition | not sourced | 108°Csourcetypical |
| Max service temperature | 704°Csourceupper use temperature stated by producer | 105°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens) |
| Values for | INCONEL alloy 718, standard grade, 1750 °F/1 hr anneal + 1325 °F/8 hr F.C. to 1150 °F aged; Special Metals bulletin SMC-045 typical values | Ultimaker PC, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS (file v5.00), April 20, 2022. |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
FDM Polycarbonate is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is Nickel Inconel 718 stronger than FDM Polycarbonate?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stronger: its yield strength is 1,207 MPa against 53.3 MPa for FDM Polycarbonate (22.6x).
Which is lighter, Nickel Inconel 718 or FDM Polycarbonate?
FDM Polycarbonate is lighter: 1,190 kg/m³ against 8,221 kg/m³ for Nickel Inconel 718.
Which is stiffer, Nickel Inconel 718 or FDM Polycarbonate?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 2.39 GPa for FDM Polycarbonate, so the same part in Nickel Inconel 718 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Nickel Inconel 718 or FDM Polycarbonate?
For the same stiffness or strength: Nickel Inconel 718 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam; FDM Polycarbonate is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | Nickel Inconel 718 | FDM Polycarbonate |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 12.1x heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 32% heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | 1.58x heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 3.28x heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 16% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | 45% heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Nickel Inconel 718 or FDM Polycarbonate?
Nickel Inconel 718 conducts heat better: 11.4 W/m·K against 0.2 W/m·K for FDM Polycarbonate.
Which expands less with temperature?
Nickel Inconel 718 expands less: 13.2 µm/m·K against 65 µm/m·K for FDM Polycarbonate.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Stainless 17-4PH
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 4340
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 1045
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Nylon
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. SLA Resin Standard