Materials / Compare

Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Plastic Polypropylene

Compare Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Plastic Polypropylene strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Nickel Inconel 718Wrought
Plastic PolypropyleneBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength1,207MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. hot-rolled bar, 0.2% offset33MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527
Ultimate tensile strength1,389MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. barnot sourced
Elongation at break20%sourcetypical, 1.0 in. barnot sourced
Young's modulus (stiffness)200GPasourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged1.45GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527
Density8,221kg/m³sourcenominal, annealed and aged900kg/m³sourcetypical, 23 °C ISO 1183-1
Strength to weight147kN·m/kg4x higher36.7kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight24.3MN·m/kg15.1x higher1.61MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.294sourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged0.42sourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)
Shear modulus77.3GPa151x stiffer in shear0.511GPa
Bulk modulus162GPa3.02GPa
Speed of sound4,932m/s1,269m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity11.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged (calculated from resistivity per footnote a)0.17–0.22W/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)
Thermal expansion13.2µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 21-93 °C, annealed + aged80–100µm/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing66µm growth6.82x less450µm growth
Specific heat435J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 21 °Cnot sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)3.19mm²/snot sourced
Thermal shock resistance3,680W/m129x more resistant28.6W/m
Melting point1,260–1,336°Csourcemelting rangenot sourced
Max service temperature704°Csourceupper use temperature stated by producer90°CsourceHDT 0.45 MPa (ISO 75B), unannealed
Values forINCONEL alloy 718, standard grade, 1750 °F/1 hr anneal + 1325 °F/8 hr F.C. to 1150 °F aged; Special Metals bulletin SMC-045 typical valuesLyondellBasell Moplen HP501H polypropylene homopolymer (general purpose), typical ISO values

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Nickel Inconel 718 stronger than Plastic Polypropylene?

Nickel Inconel 718 is stronger: its yield strength is 1,207 MPa against 33 MPa for Plastic Polypropylene (36.6x).

Which is lighter, Nickel Inconel 718 or Plastic Polypropylene?

Plastic Polypropylene is lighter: 900 kg/m³ against 8,221 kg/m³ for Nickel Inconel 718.

Which is stiffer, Nickel Inconel 718 or Plastic Polypropylene?

Nickel Inconel 718 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 1.45 GPa for Plastic Polypropylene, so the same part in Nickel Inconel 718 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Nickel Inconel 718 or Plastic Polypropylene?

For the same stiffness or strength: Nickel Inconel 718 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam; Plastic Polypropylene is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beNickel Inconel 718Plastic Polypropylene
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter15.1x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter29% heavier
Stiff panel or plate1.77x heavierlighter
Strong rod or tielighter4x heavier
Strong beamlighter21% heavier
Strong panel or plate1.51x heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Nickel Inconel 718 or Plastic Polypropylene?

Nickel Inconel 718 conducts heat better: 11.4 W/m·K against 0.195 W/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.

Which expands less with temperature?

Nickel Inconel 718 expands less: 13.2 µm/m·K against 90 µm/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelNickel Inconel 718Plastic Polypropylene
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickNickel Inconel 718Plastic Polypropylene
Strength against density

Related comparisons