Materials / Compare
Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Plastic Polypropylene
Compare Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Plastic Polypropylene strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 1,207MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. hot-rolled bar, 0.2% offset | 33MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527 |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 1,389MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar | not sourced |
| Elongation at break | 20%sourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar | not sourced |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 200GPasourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged | 1.45GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527 |
| Density | 8,221kg/m³sourcenominal, annealed and aged | 900kg/m³sourcetypical, 23 °C ISO 1183-1 |
| Strength to weight | 147kN·m/kg4x higher | 36.7kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 24.3MN·m/kg15.1x higher | 1.61MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.294sourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged | 0.42sourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene) |
| Shear modulus | 77.3GPa151x stiffer in shear | 0.511GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 162GPa | 3.02GPa |
| Speed of sound | 4,932m/s | 1,269m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 11.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged (calculated from resistivity per footnote a) | 0.17–0.22W/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene) |
| Thermal expansion | 13.2µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 21-93 °C, annealed + aged | 80–100µm/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene) |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 66µm growth6.82x less | 450µm growth |
| Specific heat | 435J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C | not sourced |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 3.19mm²/s | not sourced |
| Thermal shock resistance | 3,680W/m129x more resistant | 28.6W/m |
| Melting point | 1,260–1,336°Csourcemelting range | not sourced |
| Max service temperature | 704°Csourceupper use temperature stated by producer | 90°CsourceHDT 0.45 MPa (ISO 75B), unannealed |
| Values for | INCONEL alloy 718, standard grade, 1750 °F/1 hr anneal + 1325 °F/8 hr F.C. to 1150 °F aged; Special Metals bulletin SMC-045 typical values | LyondellBasell Moplen HP501H polypropylene homopolymer (general purpose), typical ISO values |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is Nickel Inconel 718 stronger than Plastic Polypropylene?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stronger: its yield strength is 1,207 MPa against 33 MPa for Plastic Polypropylene (36.6x).
Which is lighter, Nickel Inconel 718 or Plastic Polypropylene?
Plastic Polypropylene is lighter: 900 kg/m³ against 8,221 kg/m³ for Nickel Inconel 718.
Which is stiffer, Nickel Inconel 718 or Plastic Polypropylene?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 1.45 GPa for Plastic Polypropylene, so the same part in Nickel Inconel 718 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Nickel Inconel 718 or Plastic Polypropylene?
For the same stiffness or strength: Nickel Inconel 718 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam; Plastic Polypropylene is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | Nickel Inconel 718 | Plastic Polypropylene |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 15.1x heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 29% heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | 1.77x heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 4x heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 21% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | 1.51x heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Nickel Inconel 718 or Plastic Polypropylene?
Nickel Inconel 718 conducts heat better: 11.4 W/m·K against 0.195 W/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.
Which expands less with temperature?
Nickel Inconel 718 expands less: 13.2 µm/m·K against 90 µm/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Stainless 17-4PH
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 4340
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 1045
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. SLA Resin Tough 2000
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. Plastic ABS
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. SLS PA12 Nylon
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. Rubber