Materials / Compare

Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel A992

Compare Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel A992 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Nickel Inconel 718Wrought
Steel A992Wrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength1,207MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. hot-rolled bar, 0.2% offset385MPasourcetypical: mean of 20,295 A992 flange mill-test coupons (1998 SSPC survey), as reported by AISC
Ultimate tensile strength1,389MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar505MPasourcetypical: mean of 20,295 A992 flange mill-test coupons (1998 SSPC survey)
Elongation at break20%sourcetypical, 1.0 in. barnot sourced
Young's modulus (stiffness)200GPasourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged200GPasourcedesign value (AISC 360-16)
Density8,221kg/m³sourcenominal, annealed and aged7,850kg/m³sourcenominal (constructional data)
Strength to weight147kN·m/kg2.99x higher49kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight24.3MN·m/kg25.5MN·m/kg5% higher
Poisson's ratio0.294sourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged0.3sourcedesign value (AISC 360-16 Commentary)
Shear modulus77.3GPa76.9GPa
Bulk modulus162GPa167GPa
Speed of sound4,932m/s5,048m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity11.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged (calculated from resistivity per footnote a)48W/m·Ksourcenominal at 20 °C
Thermal expansion13.2µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 21-93 °C, annealed + aged12µm/m·Ksourcenominal (constructional data, no temperature range stated)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing66µm growth60µm growth10% less
Specific heat435J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C460–480J/kg·Ksourcebase material: EN S275JR unalloyed structural steel (the EN counterpart of A36), typical, 50/100 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)3.19mm²/s13mm²/s4.08x faster
Thermal shock resistance3,680W/m5,390W/m46% more resistant
Melting point1,260–1,336°Csourcemelting rangenot sourced
Max service temperature704°Csourceupper use temperature stated by producernot sourced
Values forINCONEL alloy 718, standard grade, 1750 °F/1 hr anneal + 1325 °F/8 hr F.C. to 1150 °F aged; Special Metals bulletin SMC-045 typical valuesASTM A992 W-shapes; Fy/Fu specified minimums from AISC publications (AISC 360-16 Commentary; Modern Steel Construction); elastic constants AISC 360; physical constants from the bauforumstahl structural-steel EPD, which names A992 among covered product standards.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Nickel Inconel 718 stronger than Steel A992?

Nickel Inconel 718 is stronger: its yield strength is 1,207 MPa against 385 MPa for Steel A992 (3.14x).

Which is lighter, Nickel Inconel 718 or Steel A992?

Steel A992 is lighter: 7,850 kg/m³ against 8,221 kg/m³ for Nickel Inconel 718.

Which is stiffer, Nickel Inconel 718 or Steel A992?

Nickel Inconel 718 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 200 GPa for Steel A992, so the same part in Nickel Inconel 718 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Nickel Inconel 718 or Steel A992?

For the same stiffness or strength: Nickel Inconel 718 is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Steel A992 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate.

Part that must beNickel Inconel 718Steel A992
Stiff rod or tie (tension)5% heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)5% heavierlighter
Stiff panel or plate5% heavierlighter
Strong rod or tielighter2.99x heavier
Strong beamlighter2.05x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter1.69x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Nickel Inconel 718 or Steel A992?

Steel A992 conducts heat better: 48 W/m·K against 11.4 W/m·K for Nickel Inconel 718.

Which expands less with temperature?

Steel A992 expands less: 12 µm/m·K against 13.2 µm/m·K for Nickel Inconel 718.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelNickel Inconel 718Steel A992
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickNickel Inconel 718Steel A992
Strength against density

Related comparisons