Materials / Compare

Iron vs. Plastic Nylon

Compare Iron vs. Plastic Nylon strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
IronWrought
Plastic Nylon3D printed (FDM)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength186MPasourcetypical (0.2% YS), hot rolled + SRA/recrystallization anneal63.1MPasourcetypical
Ultimate tensile strength290MPasourcetypical, SRA/recrystallization anneal63.1MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)
Flexural strengthnot sourced82.9MPasourcetypical
Elongation at break38%sourcetypical, gauge 4D0not sourced
Young's modulus (stiffness)207GPasourcetypical, after SRA/recrystallization anneal2.33GPasourcetypical
Density7,860kg/m³sourcetypical1,140kg/m³sourcetypical6.89x lighter
Strength to weight23.7kN·m/kg55.4kN·m/kg2.34x higher
Stiffness to weight26.3MN·m/kg12.9x higher2.04MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.282sourceNIST critically evaluated best value (polycrystalline iron)0.4sourcebase material: unfilled polyamide (PA), conditioned, maker design-guide family value (Covestro Table 3-1)
Shear modulus80.7GPa97x stiffer in shear0.833GPa
Bulk modulus158GPa3.89GPa
Speed of sound5,132m/s1,430m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity73.2W/m·Ksourcetypical at 20 °C0.33W/m·Ksourcebase material: unreinforced BASF Ultramid PA66 (A3K) and PA6 (B3S), 23 C (same value for both)
Thermal expansion13.7µm/m·Ksourcemean, 20-399 °C98–102µm/m·Ksourcebase material: unreinforced BASF Ultramid PA66 (A3K, 98) and PA6 (B3S, 102), 23-55 C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing68.5µm growth7.3x less500µm growth
Specific heat450J/kg·Ksourcetypical1,700J/kg·Ksourcebase material: unreinforced BASF Ultramid PA66 (A3K) and PA6 (B3S), 23 C (same value for both)
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)20.7mm²/s122x faster0.17mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance3,447W/m64.3x more resistant53.6W/m
Melting point1,532°Csourcetypical188°Csourcetypical
Glass transitionnot sourced55.1°Csourcetypical
Max service temperaturenot sourced89.2°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)
Values forCleveland-Cliffs / AK Steel ARMCO Pure Iron Product Data Bulletin (07/2022): Table 1 typical physical properties, Table 2 typical mechanical properties after SRA/recrystallization anneal.Ultimaker Nylon, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat), conditioned >=24 h at room temperature; Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS v2.00, April 20, 2022.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Plastic Nylon is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Iron stronger than Plastic Nylon?

Iron is stronger: its yield strength is 186 MPa against 63.1 MPa for Plastic Nylon (2.95x).

Which is lighter, Iron or Plastic Nylon?

Plastic Nylon is lighter: 1,140 kg/m³ against 7,860 kg/m³ for Iron.

Which is stiffer, Iron or Plastic Nylon?

Iron is stiffer: Young's modulus 207 GPa against 2.33 GPa for Plastic Nylon, so the same part in Iron deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Iron or Plastic Nylon?

For the same stiffness or strength: Iron is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending); Plastic Nylon is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beIronPlastic Nylon
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter12.9x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter37% heavier
Stiff panel or plate1.55x heavierlighter
Strong rod or tie2.34x heavierlighter
Strong beam3.35x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate4.02x heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Iron or Plastic Nylon?

Iron conducts heat better: 73.2 W/m·K against 0.33 W/m·K for Plastic Nylon.

Which expands less with temperature?

Iron expands less: 13.7 µm/m·K against 100 µm/m·K for Plastic Nylon.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUAluminumSteelTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelIronPlastic Nylon
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPURubberAluminumSteelTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickIronPlastic Nylon
Strength against density

Related comparisons