Materials / Compare

Iron vs. Plastic Polypropylene

Compare Iron vs. Plastic Polypropylene strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
IronWrought
Plastic PolypropyleneBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength186MPasourcetypical (0.2% YS), hot rolled + SRA/recrystallization anneal33MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527
Ultimate tensile strength290MPasourcetypical, SRA/recrystallization annealnot sourced
Elongation at break38%sourcetypical, gauge 4D0not sourced
Young's modulus (stiffness)207GPasourcetypical, after SRA/recrystallization anneal1.45GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527
Density7,860kg/m³sourcetypical900kg/m³sourcetypical, 23 °C ISO 1183-1
Strength to weight23.7kN·m/kg36.7kN·m/kg1.55x higher
Stiffness to weight26.3MN·m/kg16.3x higher1.61MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.282sourceNIST critically evaluated best value (polycrystalline iron)0.42sourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)
Shear modulus80.7GPa158x stiffer in shear0.511GPa
Bulk modulus158GPa3.02GPa
Speed of sound5,132m/s1,269m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity73.2W/m·Ksourcetypical at 20 °C0.17–0.22W/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)
Thermal expansion13.7µm/m·Ksourcemean, 20-399 °C80–100µm/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing68.5µm growth6.57x less450µm growth
Specific heat450J/kg·Ksourcetypicalnot sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)20.7mm²/snot sourced
Thermal shock resistance3,447W/m121x more resistant28.6W/m
Melting point1,532°Csourcetypicalnot sourced
Max service temperaturenot sourced90°CsourceHDT 0.45 MPa (ISO 75B), unannealed
Values forCleveland-Cliffs / AK Steel ARMCO Pure Iron Product Data Bulletin (07/2022): Table 1 typical physical properties, Table 2 typical mechanical properties after SRA/recrystallization anneal.LyondellBasell Moplen HP501H polypropylene homopolymer (general purpose), typical ISO values

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Iron stronger than Plastic Polypropylene?

Iron is stronger: its yield strength is 186 MPa against 33 MPa for Plastic Polypropylene (5.64x).

Which is lighter, Iron or Plastic Polypropylene?

Plastic Polypropylene is lighter: 900 kg/m³ against 7,860 kg/m³ for Iron.

Which is stiffer, Iron or Plastic Polypropylene?

Iron is stiffer: Young's modulus 207 GPa against 1.45 GPa for Plastic Polypropylene, so the same part in Iron deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Iron or Plastic Polypropylene?

For the same stiffness or strength: Iron is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending); Plastic Polypropylene is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beIronPlastic Polypropylene
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter16.3x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter37% heavier
Stiff panel or plate1.67x heavierlighter
Strong rod or tie1.55x heavierlighter
Strong beam2.76x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate3.68x heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Iron or Plastic Polypropylene?

Iron conducts heat better: 73.2 W/m·K against 0.195 W/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.

Which expands less with temperature?

Iron expands less: 13.7 µm/m·K against 90 µm/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelIronPlastic Polypropylene
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickIronPlastic Polypropylene
Strength against density

Related comparisons