ELEKTRON AZ91D magnesium die-casting alloy, as cast; Magnesium Elektron datasheet 475 (7/01), typical properties; Poisson from MIL-HDBK-5J for AZ91C castings.
AISI 1045 cold drawn bar (Niagara LaSalle) for mechanical; Ovako C45 (lists 'SAE 1045' as a similar designation) for physical constants
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is Magnesium AZ91D stronger than Steel AISI 1045?
Steel AISI 1045 is stronger: its yield strength is 531 MPa against 150 MPa for Magnesium AZ91D (3.54x).
Which is lighter, Magnesium AZ91D or Steel AISI 1045?
Magnesium AZ91D is lighter: 1,810 kg/m³ against 7,800 kg/m³ for Steel AISI 1045.
Which is stiffer, Magnesium AZ91D or Steel AISI 1045?
Steel AISI 1045 is stiffer: Young's modulus 210 GPa against 45 GPa for Magnesium AZ91D, so the same part in Steel AISI 1045 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Magnesium AZ91D or Steel AISI 1045?
For the same stiffness or strength: Magnesium AZ91D is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Steel AISI 1045 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension).
Part that must be
Magnesium AZ91D
Steel AISI 1045
Stiff rod or tie (tension)
8% heavier
lighter
Stiff beam (bending)
lighter
1.99x heavier
Stiff panel or plate
lighter
2.58x heavier
Strong rod or tie
lighter
22% heavier
Strong beam
lighter
1.86x heavier
Strong panel or plate
lighter
2.29x heavier
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Magnesium AZ91D or Steel AISI 1045?
Magnesium AZ91D conducts heat better: 72 W/m·K against 42.5 W/m·K for Steel AISI 1045.
Which expands less with temperature?
Steel AISI 1045 expands less: 12 µm/m·K against 25 µm/m·K for Magnesium AZ91D.