Materials / Compare
Magnesium AZ31B-H24 vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
Compare Magnesium AZ31B-H24 vs. Plastic Polycarbonate strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 220MPasourcetypical, H24, 0.5-6 mm, 0.2 % proof stress | 65MPasourcetypical, tensile yield |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 290MPasourcetypical, H24, 0.5-6 mm | 65MPasourcetypical, stress at break |
| Flexural strength | not sourced | 97MPasourcetypical, flexural strength |
| Elongation at break | 13%sourcetypical, H24, 0.5-6 mm, gauge 5.65√A | 125%sourcetypical, strain at break |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 44.8GPasourcetypical (handbook physical constant) | 2.4GPasourcetypical |
| Density | 1,769kg/m³sourcenominal | 1,200kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 124kN·m/kg2.3x higher | 54.2kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 25.3MN·m/kg12.7x higher | 2MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.35sourcetypical (handbook physical constant) | 0.38sourcetypical, polycarbonate family (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1) |
| Shear modulus | 16.6GPa19.1x stiffer in shear | 0.87GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 49.8GPa | 3.33GPa |
| Speed of sound | 5,032m/s | 1,414m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 76.9W/m·Ksourcetypical (temper/temperature not stated) | 0.2W/m·Ksourcetypical, through-plane, 23 C |
| Thermal expansion | 26.8µm/m·Ksourcetypical (temperature range not stated) | 65µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 23-55 C, parallel and normal |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 134µm growth2.43x less | 325µm growth |
| Specific heat | 1,040J/kg·Ksourcetypical | 1,172J/kg·Ksourcetypical (guide value), Bayer ASTM datasheet for Makrolon 2405, ASTM D 2766 |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 41.8mm²/s294x faster | 0.142mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 9,159W/m177x more resistant | 51.7W/m |
| Glass transition | not sourced | 144°Csourcetypical, DSC 10 C/min |
| Max service temperature | 149°Csourcestated application limit | 125°CsourceUL 746B RTI, tensile strength, 1.5 mm |
| Values for | AZ31B-H24 sheet 0.016-0.062 in., MIL-HDBK-5J Table 4.2.1.0(b) (AMS 4377); strengths are S-basis MINIMUMS | Covestro Makrolon 2405 general-purpose PC (MVR 19), Covestro technical datasheet version 2026-09-28, typical values |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is Magnesium AZ31B-H24 stronger than Plastic Polycarbonate?
Magnesium AZ31B-H24 is stronger: its yield strength is 220 MPa against 65 MPa for Plastic Polycarbonate (3.38x).
Which is lighter, Magnesium AZ31B-H24 or Plastic Polycarbonate?
Plastic Polycarbonate is lighter: 1,200 kg/m³ against 1,769 kg/m³ for Magnesium AZ31B-H24.
Which is stiffer, Magnesium AZ31B-H24 or Plastic Polycarbonate?
Magnesium AZ31B-H24 is stiffer: Young's modulus 44.8 GPa against 2.4 GPa for Plastic Polycarbonate, so the same part in Magnesium AZ31B-H24 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Magnesium AZ31B-H24 or Plastic Polycarbonate?
For the same stiffness or strength: Magnesium AZ31B-H24 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | Magnesium AZ31B-H24 | Plastic Polycarbonate |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 12.7x heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 2.93x heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 1.8x heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 2.3x heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 1.53x heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 25% heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Magnesium AZ31B-H24 or Plastic Polycarbonate?
Magnesium AZ31B-H24 conducts heat better: 76.9 W/m·K against 0.2 W/m·K for Plastic Polycarbonate.
Which expands less with temperature?
Magnesium AZ31B-H24 expands less: 26.8 µm/m·K against 65 µm/m·K for Plastic Polycarbonate.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Magnesium AZ31B-H24 vs. Concrete
- Magnesium AZ31B-H24 vs. Aluminum 5052-H32
- Magnesium AZ31B-H24 vs. Aluminum
- Magnesium AZ31B-H24 vs. Aluminum 6061-T6
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Nylon
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. SLA Resin Standard
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. FDM Polycarbonate
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Plastic POM/Acetal